WTO《政府采购协定》国内救济规定研究被引量：3

The Provisions on Domestic Review Procedures in the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement

导出

摘要 1994年签订的WTO《政府采购协定》中首次要求GPA参加方建立国内政府采购救济机制,并规定了对该机制的原则性要求及该机制应包含的基本内容和相关要求。修订后的GPA2012文本补充修改了原有国内救济规定,将GPA对参加方国内政府采购救济机制的原则性要求重新排序为"及时、有效、透明、非歧视",并对其基本内容进行了一些修订。基于GPA2012规定,可分析归纳出GPA对参加方国内政府采购救济机制中质疑人的范围、质疑处理机构与渠道、供应商提出质疑的时限以及具体救济方法方面的最低标准。我国在改进政府采购质疑与投诉处理机制时应注意满足GPA的这些最低标准要求,并在此基础上适当采用更高标准,以使我国的政府采购救济机制既能满足GPA的相关要求,又能切实有效地发挥作用。 In the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement signed in 1994(GPA1994), it is the first time that has required GPA Parties should establish a national challenge system, and general requirements and basic elements of such a system are also set forth. The revised GPA(GPA2012) supplements and revises the provisions on national challenge procedures, and rearranges the order of the aforesaid general requirements as 'timeless, effectiveness, transparency and non-discrimination'. GPA2012 makes certain amendments to the provisions on basic elements of a national challenge system; based on the relevant provisions of the GPA2012, GPA's minimum standards on the scope of complainants, forum for review, the time limit for initiating a challenge, as well as remedies available for suppliers, can be summarized.

作者张幸临

机构地区东北财经大学法学院

出处《中国高校社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期96-108,157,共13页 Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions

基金教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"符合GPA要求的政府采购救济机制构建研究"(11YJA820115)阶段性成果

关键词《政府采购协定》救济机制国内审查程序供应商质疑 GPA remedies system domestic review procedures suppliers challenge

分类号 D996.2 [政治法律—经济法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1WTO官网:https://www.wto.org/english/tratop—e/gproc—e/memobs—e.htm.
2GPA1994第22条.
3GPA2012第20条.
4GPA2012第224条.
5GPA1994第245条.
6See Sue Arrowsmith, "The Character and Role of National Challenge Procedures under the Government Procure- ment Agreement", Public Procurement Law Review, issue 4, 2002, p. 241.
7See Sue Arrowsmith, "The Character and Role of National Challenge Procedures under the Government Procure- ment Agreement", Public Procurement Law Review, issue 4, 2002, p. 242.
8See Sue Arrowsmith, Government Procurement in the WTO, Kluwer Law International, 2003, p. 391.
9See Arie Reich, International Public Proeurement Law: the Evolution of International Regime on Public Pur- chasing, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 308.
10See Xinglin Zhang, "Constructing a system of challenge procedures to comply with the Agreement on Govern- ment Procurement", in: Sue Arrowsmith and Robert D. Anderson eds., The WTO Regime on Government Pro- eurement:Challenge and Reform, Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 483-510.

二级参考文献17

1Arrowsmith, S., Anderson, R.D. The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 285-236.
2Arrowsmith, S. The Character and Role of National Challenge Procedures under the Government Procurement Agreement [ J ]. Public Procurement Law Review, 2002, ( 11 ) : 235-260.
3Anderson, R. D. Renewing the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement: Progress to Date and Ongoing Negotiation [J]. Public Procurement Law Review, 2007, (16): 255.
4Reich, A. The New Text of the Agreement on Government Procurement : An Analysis and Assessment [ J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2009, (4) : 1015-1022.
5Pachnou, D. Bidder Remedies to Enforce the EC Procurement Rules in England and Wales [ J ]. Public Procurement Law Review, 2003, ( 1 ) : 35-64.
6Boris, C. EC Public Procurement: Case Law and Regulation [ M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 493-499.
7Zhang, X. Forum for Review by Suppliers in Public Procurement: An Analysis and Assessment of tile Models in International Instruments [ J ]. Public Procurement Law Review, 2009, (5) : 223-224.
8Grier, J. H. Uncertain Prospects for Japan's Bid Challenge Mechanism I J]. Public Procurement Law Review, 2001, (3) : 81.
9Gao. H. The Bid Challenge ProcedL,res under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement: A Critical Study of the HongKong Experience [J]. Public Procurement Law Review, 2007, (4) : 211.
10Gordon, D. 1. Constructing a Bid Protest Process: The Choices that Every Procurement Challenge System Must Take [ J ]. Public Contract Law Journal, 2006, (35): 434.