期刊文献+

为什么过去统计数据无法预测未来——兼论经济计量学的局限性 被引量:2

Why does the past statistical data not predict the future?--Analysis of risk and uncertainty distinction
原文传递
导出
摘要 主流经济学建立在完全知识或理性预期的假定之上,看不到任何市场异常现象和政府干预,很可能变成数学、统计学或经济计量学的一个应用分支。一旦走进根本不确定性和非遍历性的世界里,这些主流经济学就不合适了,经济计量学发展就会受到限制,从而难以应用数量模型来指导真实世界,所谓的经济科学就难以成立。经济行为和制度设计原则在于降低根本不确定性和不稳定性,经济学不能简单作为应用数学的分支。进一步弥合经济理论与市场经济之间的巨大脱节,对于全面认识经济学理论发展以及市场经济体制的政策或制度设计具有重要意义。 The main stream economics is established on the hypothesis of perfect knowledge and rational expectations. It neglects any abnormal market phenomenon, and it could become one of the branches of application of math, statistics and econo- metrics. However, once taking into account the uncertainties and non-universalities, the main stream economics becomes unsuit- able. The development of econometrics will be limited. So it becomes difficult to use quantitative model to guide the real world. The so-called science of economics is hard to set up. The principle of economic behavior and institutional design aims to lower uncertainty and instability. It can' t be just simply considered as one of the braches of applied math. It can close the gap between economic theory and market economy, and it is of great significance to understand the development of economic theories, policy and institutional design in an all-round way.
作者 汤吉军
出处 《经济学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期29-36,共8页 Economist
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"推进经济结构战略性调整研究"(13&ZD022) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目"交易成本 沉淀成本与政府反垄断问题研究"(NCET-13-0247) 吉林大学"985"工程 青年学术领袖项目"国有企业治理结构的路径依赖及其超越研究"(2015FRLX09)
关键词 根本不确定性 风险 经济计量学 非计量化 Fundamental uncertainty Risk Econometrics Non-quantification
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1DAVIDSON P. Is Economics a Science?Should Economics Be Rigorous[J].Real-World Economics Review, 2012, (59) 58-66.
  • 2COASE, R. The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica, 1937, (4): 386-405.
  • 3多迪默.经济学正在成为硬科学吗[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002.
  • 4DAVIDSON, P. Rational Expectations: A Fallacious Foundation for Studying Crucial Decision Making Process[J].Joumal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1982,5 (2) : 182-197.
  • 5汤吉军.经济学研究的遍历性与非遍历性假设:争论与拓展[J].经济学动态,2013(9):119-128. 被引量:4
  • 6DEQUECH D. The New Institutional Economics and the Theory of Behavior under Uncertainty[J].Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2006, 59 (4) : 109-131.
  • 7VICKERS D. Economics and the Antagonism of Time[M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994: 56-70.
  • 8罗伯特·斯基德尔斯基.重新发现凯恩斯[M].秦一琼,译. 北京:机械工业出版社,2011.
  • 9MILLER, E. Risk, Uncertainty and Divergence of Opinion[J].Journal of Finance, 1977,32 (4) : 1151 - 1168.
  • 10保罗·载维森.约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯[M].张军,译.北京:华夏出版社,2009:83-84.

二级参考文献72

  • 1Allington,N. ,J. McCombie g> M. Pike(2011),"The failure of the new macroeconomic consensus:From non ergodicity to the efficient market hypothesis and back again", International Journal of Public Policy 7(1) :4-21.
  • 2Arestis,P. (2004), "Washington consensus and financial liberalization",Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27 (2) : 251-271.
  • 3Arestis,P. & M. Sawyer(2012),"The 'new economics' and policies for financial stability", International Review of Applied Economics 26(2):147-160.
  • 4Arrow,K. (1992),"I know a hawk from a handsaw" , in M. Szenberg(ed) ,Eminent Economists: Their Life and Philosophies, Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Bauer, P. ( 1987), "The disregard of reality", Cato Journal 7 29-42.
  • 6Bernstein, P. (1996), Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk, New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  • 7Coase,R. (1937), "The nature of the firm", Economica 4: 386-405.
  • 8Coase,R. (2012),"Saving economics from the economists", Harvard Business Review, Nov.
  • 9Cooper,G. & C. McGillem(1998), Probabilistic Methods of Signal and System Analysis, Oxford University Press.
  • 10Davidson, P. ( 1982 ), " Rational expectations: A fallacious foundation for studying crucial decision making process", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5(2):182-197.

共引文献14

同被引文献27

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部