摘要
刘艳从为人类而艺术的视界研究曹禺,深化了对曹禺早期剧作悲剧意蕴、后期创作障碍和曹禺为何未能成为艺术大师的认识,开辟了曹禺研究的新路径;但同时也存在着用抽象单一的理论命题去规范具体丰富的艺术创作、有意忽略20世纪上半期在反帝反封建革命烈火燃烧的土地上所生成的时代美学主潮,从而遮蔽了曹禺剧作原本具有的启蒙文化与政治文化内涵。
Ms.LIU Yan researches CAO Yu on the basis of version on arts for humanity that deepen the understanding of the tragic meaning of CAO Yu's early Works,barriers of his later poetry and the reason why CAO Yu cannot become a maestro,which opens up a new path on CAO Yu's research;however,there exists in Ms.LIU Yan's view of using single theoretical proposition to restrict abundant art creation and her ignorance of the main trend of Age Aesthetics which born on the anti-imperialist,anti-feudal,and revolutionary land in the first half of 20 th century on purpose.Thus she hides the original meaning of CAO Yu's production which includes the illuminative and political culture.
出处
《岭南师范学院学报》
2016年第1期58-68,共11页
Journal of Lingnan Normal University
关键词
曹禺
悲剧
为人类而艺术
时代美学主潮
CAO Yu
tragic drama
arts for humanity
main trend of Age Aesthetics