期刊文献+

基于FMEA的伽玛刀治疗计划质量改进 被引量:5

Quality improvements of gamma knife treatment plan based on FMEA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :运用先进的质控工具,前瞻性地对伽玛刀治疗计划设计的风险进行分析、评价,对关键事件进行改进。方法 :由物理师、医师与技师组成的质量改进小组采用失效模式与效应分析(failure mode and effect analysis,FMEA),对200份伽玛刀治疗计划与100例计划设计过程进行失效风险评价,运用因果法与故障树法分析失效原因,找出改进对策。结果:对风险较高的9个失效模式、16个失效原因进行改进后,风险值明显降低,平均下降(61.125±8.125)%。结论:FMEA是改进伽玛刀治疗计划设计质量的有效工具,有助于减少潜在风险的发生。 Objective:By using the advanced quality control tools,we analyzed and evaluated the risk of planning designs of gamma knife treatment prospectively,and improved the key events. Methods:A quality reconstruction team of physicists,oncologists and therapists conducted failure risk assessment analysis toward 200 gamma knife treatment plans and 100 treatment designs were performed by using failure mode and effect analysis(FEMA),and failure cause and countermeasures were analyzed by using causal factor analysis and fault tree analysis. Results:The risk priority number was significantly decreased [average of(61.125 ± 8.125)% ]after conducting improvement on 9 potential failure modes and 16 potential causes of failure. Conclusion:FMEA is a effective tool to improve the quality of gamma knife treatment planning designs. It helps reduce the potential risks as well.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期371-374,379,共5页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
关键词 放射治疗 伽玛刀 治疗计划 质量改进 FMEA radiotherapy gamma knife treatment plan quality improvement FMEA
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Benedict SH,Yenice KM, Followill D,et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy:the report of AAPM Task Group 101[J]. Med Phys,2010,37(8):4078-4101.
  • 2European Society of Radiology. Summary of the European directive 2013/59/ Euratom: essentials for health profes- sionals in radiology[J]. Insights Imaging,2015,6 (4): 411-417.
  • 3Ford EC,Smith K,Terezakis S,et al. A streamlined fail- ure mode and effects analysis[Jl. Med Phys,2014,41 (6) :061709.
  • 4Younge KC, Wang Y,Thompson J, et al. Practical imple- mentation of failure mode and effects analysis for safety and efficiency in stereotactic radiosurgery[J]. Int J Radi- at Oncol Biol Phys,2015,91(5) : 1003-1008.
  • 5Begnozzi L, Cantone MC, Longobardi B,et al. Prospective approaches for risk analysis in modern radiotherapy:the Italian experience and the contribution of the medical physicists[J]. Radioprotection,2014,49( 1 ) :43-47.
  • 6Ciocca M,Cantone MC,Veronese I,et al. Application of failure mode and effects analysis to intraoperative radia- tion therapy using mobile electron linear accelerators[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012,82 (2):e305-e311.
  • 7Manger RP,Paxton AB,Pawlicki T,et al. Failure mode and effects analysis and fault tree analysis of surface im- age guided cranial radiosurgery[J]. Med Phy,2015,42 (5) : 2449-2461.
  • 8Cantone MC,Ciocca M,Dionisi F,et al. Application of failure mode and effects analysis to treatment planning in scanned proton beam radiotherapy[J].Radiat Oncol, 2013,8(2) : 127.
  • 9Broggi S,Cantone MC,Chiara A,et al. Application of fail- ure mode and effects analysis(FMEA) to pretreatment phases in tomotherapy [J]. J Appl Clin Med Phys,2013,14 (5) : 265-277.
  • 10Masini L,Donis L,Loi G,et al. Application of failure mode and effects analysis to intracranial stereotactic radiation surgery by linear accelerator[J]. Pract Radiat Oncol, 2014,4(6) :392-397.

二级参考文献6

共引文献8

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部