期刊文献+

“郑声淫”再探 被引量:1

A New Exploration on Confucius' Viewpoint that Zheng Music was Obscene
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自孔子提出"恶郑声""郑声淫"之后,围绕"郑声淫"的一系列问题随之而生。孔子以"郑声"乱"雅乐"之名,给"郑声"冠上了"淫"的恶谥,但对于到底何为"郑声",他却并未明说。于是"郑声淫"这一问题便成了《诗经》学史上的未解之谜。依据相关文献可知,"郑声"是一种异于古乐的"新乐",因其音乐形式上的过分奇巧和内在蕴含的淫靡情感而被斥之为"淫"。它其实只是一种时代的产物,相对来说更能充分表达人的本质情感。 After Confucius proposed the viewpoints that Zheng Music was obscene and it should be detested, a series of problems about Zheng Music arose. Because Confucius deemed that Zheng Music disturbed the classical court music, be defined it with a malicious reputation for"obscenity"; However,he didn't say explicitly about what the Zheng Music was. Thus Zheng Music being lascivious became a unsolved complicated case in the history of studying Book of Songs. According to relevant literature,Zheng Music was a kind of new music different from the ancient music, and it was denounced as obscene because of the excessive external form and inner emotion. Actually,it was just the product of that times,and it could fully express the essence of human emotion.
机构地区 河南大学文学院
出处 《乐山师范学院学报》 2016年第3期26-29,共4页 Journal of Leshan Normal University
关键词 诗经 郑声 Book of Songs Zheng Music Obscene
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1〔清〕马瑞辰.毛诗传笺通释[M].陈金生,点校.北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 2〔清〕孙希旦.礼记集解[M].北京:中华书局,1989.
  • 3〔清〕刘宝楠.论语正义[M].北京:中华书局,1990.
  • 4〔南宋〕朱熹,诗集传[M].赵长征,点校.北京:中华书局,2011.
  • 5续修四库全书·五经异义疏证(171)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 6〔汉〕司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
  • 7〔清〕戴震.戴东原集(四部丛刊初编集部)[M].上海:商务印书馆,1936.
  • 8陈子展.诗经直解[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1983..
  • 9樊荣.还“郑声”以本来面目[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),1993,33(2):46-51. 被引量:1
  • 10〔明〕谢肇淛.五杂俎[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2009.

共引文献458

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部