摘要
在传统司法实践中,一律认为吸毒所致精神障碍者实施了危害行为应追究刑责的观点太过片面。文章从罪刑法定原则出发,认为吸毒后实施危害行为不能直接适用刑法第18条第4款关于醉酒的规定,且应区分吸毒行为与吸毒成瘾以及因吸毒造成的器质性精神障碍三种类型,针对不同情形,对行为人的处理也应有所不同,同时还应关注保安处分制度对吸毒所致精神障碍者的重要矫正作用。
In traditional judicial practice,drug abusers with mental disorder who implemented harmful behavior should assume criminal responsibility,which cannot stand a point in some way. Based on the legal prescription of legality, this article argues that the provisions of Paragraph 4 of Article 18 about drunk crimes cannot directly apply the harmful behaviors after drug abuse,and should distinguish three different tg-pes, namely drug abuse,drug addiction and organic mental disorder. As the different tgpes of drug users, the actors' situations should also be different. Meanwhile, measure of security system should be taken into consideration for those drug abusers with mental disorder.
出处
《乐山师范学院学报》
2016年第3期109-114,共6页
Journal of Leshan Normal University
关键词
吸毒
器质性精神障碍
罪刑法定
处遇
Drug Abuse
Organic Disorder
Legal Prescription of Legality
Circumstances