论“法官造法”的正当性与限制性

On the Legitimacy and Limitation of “Judges Make Law”Phenomenon

由于成文法固有的局限性,"法官造法"成为大陆法系不可抗拒的潮流。"法官造法"是克服成文法局限性、实现个案正义的必要手段,具有正当性。但必须看到,"法官造法"引入了法官个人的主观价值判断,且违反了法不溯及既往原则,会削弱法律的稳定性,同时导致司法权对立法权的侵蚀。因此需运用一定的法律解释方法限制"法官造法",尽可能地将法官的主观价值判断客观化,以使法律的适用能在稳定性与灵活性之间求得适当的平衡,同时应构建相应的司法制度防止"法官造法"权力的滥用。

Due to the inherent limitations of the statute law,the phenomenon of ＂judges make law＂has become an irresistible trend in the civil law system. ＂Judge makes law＂is a necessary means to overcome the limitations of the statute law and realize the justice of the case.But we should not ignore the fact that ＂judges make law＂introduces the judge individual subjective value judgment and is in violation of the principle of non retroactivity of law,which will weaken the law＇s stability and lead to erosion of jurisdiction of legislative power.Therefore,it is necessary to use certain legal interpretation method and limitation of ＂made law＂to achieve the judge＇s subjective value judgment and to make the law applicable to obtain the proper balance between stability and flexibility,.At the same time,we should build the corresponding judicial system to prevent the abuse of ＂judges make law＂.