期刊文献+

基于CGE模型的碳税政策对碳排放及居民福利的影响分析 被引量:13

Impact Assessment of CGE-Based Carbon Tax on Carbon Emission Reduction and Resident Welfare
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过构建可计算一般均衡模型,分析了征收10元/吨、20元/吨、30元/吨和40元/吨碳税对宏观经济的影响,其次,利用经济产出效应和能源强度效应来衡量碳税的减排效果,最后,模拟保持居民福利水平不变的情况,分析碳税的"双重红利"。研究结论表明:碳税是一种可行的政策选择,能够明显降低二氧化碳排放;除政府收入和消费增加,对其他宏观经济变量如实际GDP、名义GDP和居民福利均产生负效应;居民的收入和消费降低,但农村居民和城镇居民受影响的程度存在差异;碳税的实施充分发挥了能源强度效应的抑制作用并减弱了经济产出效应的促进作用;在征收碳税的同时降低个人所得税率,保持居民福利不变,可以实现碳税的"双重红利效应"。 In this paper, the macroeconomic impacts of the carbon tax policy by levying 10 yuan/ton, 20 yuan/ton, 30 yuan/ton,and 40 yuan/ton based on CGE model are discussed, and the reductions of carbon tax are measured by the economic output effect and en- ergy intensity effect. Finally, the "double dividend" effect of carbon tax is analyzed by maintaining a constant level of residents' welfare. The results show that levying carbon tax is a viable policy which can reduce carbon dioxide emissions obviously; in addition to government revenue and consumption increased, the carbon tax would have negative impacts on real GDP, nominal GDP and residents' welfare and some other macroeconomie variables; residents' income and consumption are reduced, but the level of the rural residents and urban resi- dents affected by the carbon tax is different; the implementation of a carbon tax to strengthen the constraint of the energy intensity effect and weaken the promotion of the economic output effect; if the residents' income tax rate is decreased and the residents' welfare is kept fixed, the effect of "double dividend" could be achieved.
机构地区 中国矿业大学
出处 《工业技术经济》 北大核心 2016年第5期52-59,共8页 Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目编号:71573253)
关键词 碳税 可计算一般均衡模型 碳排放 居民福利 carbon tax CGE model carbon emissions resident welfare
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Johansen,Leif,A Multi-sectoral Study of Economic Growth[M].Amsterdam:North-Holland,1960.
  • 2Whalley J,Wigle R.Results for the OECD Comparative Project from the Whalley-Wigle[R].OECD Economics Department Working Papers.OECD Publishing,1992:121.
  • 3Whalley J,Wigle R.Cutting CO2 Emissions:The Effect of Alternative Policy Approaches[J].The Energy Journal.1991,12(1):109-124.
  • 4JM Burniaux,G Nicoletti,J Oliveira-Martins.Green:A Global Model for Quantifying the Costs of Policies to Curb CO2 Emissions[R].OECD Economic Studies,1992,(19):39-72.
  • 5Carlo Carraro,Marzio Galeottib,Massimo Gallod.Environmental Taxation and Unemployment:Some Evidence on the‘Double Dividend Hypothesis’in Europe[J].Journal of Public Economics,1996,62(1):141-181.
  • 6Wissema & Dellink.AGE Analysis of the Impact of A Carbon Energy Tax on the Irish Economy[J].Ecological Economics,2007,61(4):671-683.
  • 7Grant Allana,Patrizio Leccaa,Peter McGregora,Kim Swalesa.The Economic and Environmental Impact of A Carbon Tax for Scotland:A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis[J].Ecological Economics,2014,100:40-50.
  • 8Silvia Calderóna,Andrés Camilo Alvareza,Ana María Loboguerrerob,SantiagoArangoc,Katherine Calvind,Tom Kobere,Kathryn Daenzerf,Karen Fisher-Vandenf.Achieving CO2 Reductions in Colombia:Effects of Carbon Taxes and Abatement Targets[J].Energy Economics,2015,(5):10-22.
  • 9贺菊煌,沈可挺,徐嵩龄.碳税与二氧化碳减排的CGE模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002,19(10):39-47. 被引量:206
  • 10魏涛远,格罗姆斯洛德.征收碳税对中国经济与温室气体排放的影响[J].世界经济与政治,2002(8):47-49. 被引量:162

二级参考文献61

共引文献654

同被引文献165

引证文献13

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部