期刊文献+

美国专利侵权损害赔偿额的计算及借鉴意义 被引量:2

The Calculation of Damages for Patent Infringement in the United States and Its Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国专利法对专利侵权损害赔偿数额的计算,是以专利权人所失利益和合理的专利使用费作为规范基础的。权利人可以提出各种方法来证实其所失利益或合理使用费的数额,在所失利益的举证上,专利权人应首先证明其所失利益与侵权行为之间的因果关系,否则,只能请求法院酌定合理的专利使用费。近年来,由于各种计算方法的精细化,大量的经济学、会计学计算方法及原理原则,在个案中被律师广泛采用,使得美国专利侵权损害赔偿数额的计算呈现高度精细化发展的趋势。反观我国专利法及相关司法解释对专利侵权损害赔偿数额的计算还比较粗糙,欠缺科学性,而美国专利法及法院判例对专利侵权损害赔偿数额的计算可以为我国提供有益的借鉴。 In the United States, the calculation of the compensation amount of the Patent Law on patent infringement is based on the patentee's lost profits and reasonable patent royalties. The obligee can propose various methods to confirm the amount of lost profits and the reasonable patent royalties. In the process of proving the proof for the lost profits, the patentee should first prove the causal relationship between the lost benefits and the tort; otherwise, what the patentee can do is to request the court to make a reasonable discretion of patent royalties. In recent years, due to the refinement of various calculation methods, a lot of economics, accounting calculation methods and principles are widely used by individual lawyer in individual case, so that making the calculation more accurate. In contrast, the amount calculation of the patent law of China and the relevant judicial interpretation of patent infringement compensation is relatively rough and is lack of scientificity. For this perspective, the method of amount calculation of US can provide a useful reference for our country.
作者 李磊
出处 《宁夏社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期60-68,共9页 NingXia Social Sciences
基金 2015年中国博士后科学基金资助项目"我国主观预备合并之诉法制化研究"(项目编号:2015M571529) 2015年国家社科基金一般项目"民事证人庭外作证体系研究"(项目编号:15BFX068)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 专利侵权 所失利益 因果关系 可预见性 惩罚性赔偿金 patent infringement, the lost interest, causal relationship, predictability, punitive damages
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1无,张丹,李春新.美国专利诉讼案件快速增加 企业面临日益严峻的专利风险——1991~2012年,美国专利诉讼案件数量以6.4%的复合年度增长率(CAGR)持续增加,2012年美国专利诉讼案件达5189件,增长率达30%[J].世界石油工业,2014,0(6):34-38. 被引量:1
  • 2See Mark A. Glick, Lara A: Reymann, Richard Hoffman, Intellectual Property Damages : Guideline & Analysis, Chapter 6. John Witey & Sons, Inc. (2003). 35.
  • 3U. S. C. A 284 : upon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate infringe- ment but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs ad fixed by court. See Aro Manufacturing Co. c. Convertible Top Replacement Co. ,377 U.S. 476,507(1964).
  • 4See also Daniel C. Munson, The Equitable Profits and Reasonable Royalty Remedies-An Economic Connection,76 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc' y 887, 889 -93.
  • 5John S. Torkelson, Calculating Reasonable Royalty Damages for Infringement of Early - Stage Technology Patents,4 Sedona Conf. j. 47, 47 -49.
  • 6See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp. , 767 F. 2d 853,863,226 U. S. P. Q. 402 ,409 ( Fed. Cir. 1985).
  • 7Id. See also Kaufman Co. v. Lanteeh,Ine. ,926 F. 2d 1136,1141,17 U. S. P. Q. 2d 1828,1831 (Fed. Cir. 1991).
  • 8See Rite-Hire Corp. v. Kelley Co. , 56 F. 3d 1545, 35 USPQ2d 1065, 1069(Fed. Cir. 1995)(en bane).
  • 9See Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Brothers Fibre Works, Icn. , 575 F. 2d 1152(6th Cir. 1978).
  • 10See Slimfold Manufacturing v. Kinkead Industries, 932 F. 2d 1453(Fed. Cir. 1991 ).

引证文献2

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部