期刊文献+

生物膜包裹间充质干细胞对甘油所致急性肾损伤小鼠肾的保护作用 被引量:2

Protective effect of mesenchymal stem cells wrapped in biological membrane on acute kidney injury of mice induced by glycerol
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究生物膜(一种异种脱细胞真皮基质)包裹间充质干细胞对甘油所致急性肾损伤(acute kidney injury,AKI)小鼠肾的保护作用。方法健康雄性C57BL/6小鼠(8-12周龄,体质量20-25g)40只,适应性喂养1周后,随机分为4组,每组各10只:正常对照组,双肾包膜剥离手术+0.9%氯化钠注射液(Sham+NS);AKI模型组,双肾包膜剥离手术+甘油注射(RM);生物膜组,生物膜包裹无肾包膜双肾+甘油注射(RM+BM);生物膜包裹间充质干细胞组,生物膜包裹间充质干细胞包裹无包膜双肾+甘油注射(RM+BM+MSCs)。观察各组小鼠一般状态、血肌酐、尿素氮指标变化及肾组织学变化。结果 RM组、RM+BM组与Sham+NS组比较,小鼠出现精神萎靡、反应迟钝及肉眼血尿,进食进水量明显减少。RM+BM+MSCs组小鼠精神萎靡、反应迟钝及肉眼血尿的状况较RM组和RM+BM组有所缓解。RM组小鼠与Sham+NS组比较,血肌酐、尿素氮明显升高[(221.75±24.60)μmol/L vs(20.64±2.68)μmol/L,P〈0.01;(87.31±13.90)mmol/L vs(10.71±1.52)mmol/L,P〈0.01]。RM+BM组小鼠的血肌酐、尿素氮较RM组无统计学差异[(206.68±21.75)μmol/L vs(221.75±24.60)μmol/L,P〉0.05;(87.62±11.23)mmol/L vs(87.31±13.90)mmol/L,P〉0.05]。RM+BM+MSCs组小鼠的血肌酐、尿素氮较RM组和RM+BM组明显改善[(34.30±6.69)μmol/L vs(221.75±24.60)μmol/L、(206.68±21.75)μmol/L,P〈0.01;(12.32±1.57)mmol/L vs(87.31±13.90)mmol/L、(87.62±11.23)mmol/L,P〈0.01]。RM组和RM+BM组肉眼可见肾大,PAS染色显示肾小管上皮细胞肿胀、变性、刷状缘消失和部分上皮细胞坏死,伴有肌红蛋白管型形成。RM+BM+MSCs组肾大不明显,肾损伤较RM组和RM+BM组明显减轻,肾小管内管型减少,上皮细胞坏死减轻,可见不连续的刷状缘。结论生物膜包裹间充质干细胞对甘油所致急性肾损伤小鼠肾具有保护作用。 Objective To study the protective effect of mesenchymal stem cells(MSCs) wrapped in biological membrane(an acellular dermal matrix allograft) on acute kidney injury(AKI) of mice induced by glycerol. Methods Forty healthy male C57BL/6 mice(age of 8-12 weeks, weight of 20-25 g) were fed adaptively for 1 week, and they were randomly divided into four groups including: normal control group with renal capsular dissection surgery plus 0.9% Na Cl solution injection(Sham+NS group, n=10), AKI model group with renal capsular dissection surgery plus glycerol injection [RM(Rhabdomyolysis) group, n=10], biological membrane group with biological membrane wrapping up renal without capsule plus glycerol injection [RM+BM(biological membrane) group, n=10] and MSCs wrapped in biological membrane group with mesenchymal stem cells(MSCs) wrapped in biological membrane packaging renal without capsule plus glycerol injection group(RM+BM+MSCs group, n=10). The general status, indexes of renal function including serum creatinine and urea nitrogen as well as renal histopathological changes of each group were observed.Results Compared with Sham+NS group, mice in RM and RM+BM group showed symptoms of depression, macroscopic haematuria and poor appetite, while the mental state, appetite and haematuria of mice in RM+BM+MSCs group were better than RM group and RM+BM group. Compared with Sham+NS group, the serum creatinine and urea nitrogen of mice in RM group increased significantly [(221.75±24.60)μmol/L vs(20.64±2.68) μmol/L, P〈0.01;(87.31±13.90) mmol/L vs(10.71±1.52) mmol/L, P〈0.01], while it had no statistically significant different between RM group and RM+BM group [(206.68±21.75) μmol/L vs(221.75±24.60) μmol/L, P〉0.05;(87.62±11.23) mmol/L vs(87.31±13.90) mmol/L, P〉0.05], and it showed significant improvement in RM+BM+MSCs group when compared with RM group and RM+BM group [(34.30±6.69) μmol/L vs(221.75±24.60) μmol/L and(206.68±21.75) μmol/L, P〈0.01;(12.32±1.57) mmol/L vs(87.31±13.90) mmol/L and(87.62±11.23) mmol/L, P〈0.01]. Visible kidney enlargement was seen in RM group and RM + BM group accompanied by swelling and degeneration in the renal tubular epithelial cells, disappearance of brush border, necrosis of part of the epithelial cells and formation of myoglobin tube in PAS staining. Compared with RM group and RM+BM group, kidney enlargement was not obvious with slightly damage in RM+BM+MSCs group. The number of tube and necrosis reduced, and discontinuous brush border was seen in PAS staining. Conclusion MSCs wrapped in biological membrane shows protective effect on acute kidney injury of mice induced by glycerol.
出处 《解放军医学院学报》 CAS 2016年第5期475-478,共4页 Academic Journal of Chinese PLA Medical School
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2014CBA02005) 国家自然科学基金项目(81470949) 北京市科技新星计划(Z121107002512078) 全军医学科技青年培育项目(13QNP180)
关键词 生物膜 间充质干细胞 横纹肌溶解 急性肾损伤 biofilms mesenchymal stem cells rhabdomyolysis acute kidney injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Sawhney S, Mitchell M, Marks A, et al. Long-term prognosis after acute kidney injury ( AKI ) : what is the role of baseline kidney function and recovery? A systematic review [ J ] . BMJ Open, 2015, 5 ( 1 ) : e006497.
  • 2Morabito S, Pistolesi V, Tritapepe L, et al. Regional citrate anticoagulation for RRTs in critically ill patients with AKI [ J ] . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2014, 9 ( 12 ) : 2173-2188.
  • 3Hopkins C, Li J, Rae F, et al. Stem cell options for kidney disease[J].J Pathol, 2009, 217 ( 2 ) : 265-281.
  • 4Benigni A, Morigi M, Remuzzi G. Kidney regeneration [ J ] . Lancet, 2010, 375 ( 9722 ) : 1310-1317.
  • 5Hailer H, De Groot K, Bahlmann F, et al. Stem cells and progenitor cells in renal disease [J]. Kidney Int, 2005, 68 ( 5 ) : 1932-1936.
  • 6Hu J, Zhang L, Wang N, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells attenuate ischemic acute kidney injury by inducing regulatory T cells through splenocyte interactions [ J ] . Kidney Int, 2013, 84 ( 3 ) : 521-531.
  • 7Basile DP, Bonventre JV, Mehta R, et al. Progression after AKI : Understanding Maladaptive Repair Processes to Predict and Identify Therapeutic Treatments [ J/OL ] . http : //jasn.asnjournals.org/ content/early/2015/10/30/ASN. 2015030309 .long.
  • 8Pannu N, James M, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Association between AKI, recovery of renal function, and long-term outcomes after hospital discharge [ J ] . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013, 8 ( 2 ) : 194-202.
  • 9Fukazawa K, Lee HT. Volatile anesthetics and AKI : risks, mechanisms, and a potential therapeutic window [ J ] . J Am Soe Nephrol, 2014, 25 ( 5 ) : 884-892.
  • 10Okusa MD, Rosner MH, Kellum JA, et al. Therapeutic targets of human AKI : harmonizing human and animal AKI [ J ] . J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016, 27 ( 1 ) : 44-48.

二级参考文献38

  • 1Wei PC, Laurell L, Lingen MW, et al. Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part2. A histologyc - al comparative study[J]. J Periodontol, 2002, 73 ( 3 ) : 257 - 265
  • 2Woodyard JG, Greenwell H, Hill, et al. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone [ J]. J Periodontol, 2004, 75(1):44 -56
  • 3Gapski R, Parks CA, Wang HL. Acellular dermal matrix for mucog - ingival surgery : a meta - analysis [ J ]. J Periodontol, 2005, 76(11): 1814 - 1822
  • 4Steele MH, Seagle MB. Palatal fistula repair using acellular dermal matrix: the University of Florida experience[J].Ann Plast Surg, 2006, 56( 1 ) : 50 - 53
  • 5Kirschner RE, Cabiling DS, Slemp AE, et al. Repair of oronasal fistulae with acellular dermal matrices [ J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006, 118(6): 1431 -1440
  • 6Rhee PH, Friedman CD, Ridge JA, et al. The use of processed allograft dermal matrix for intraoral resurfacing: an ahernative to split- thickness skin grafts [J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1998, 124 ( 11 ) : 1201 - 1204
  • 7Koch M,Zenk J,Iro H.Long-term results of morbidity after parotid gland surgery in benign disease.Laryngoscope.2010;120(4):724-730.
  • 8Ali NS,Nawaz A,Rajput S,et al.Parotidectomy:a review of 112 patients treated at a teaching hospital in pakistan.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev.2010;11(4):1111-1113.
  • 9Clayman MA,Clayman SM,Seagle MB.A review of the surgical and medical treatment of Frey syndrome.Ann Plast Surg.2006;57(5):581-584.
  • 10C?té D,Harris JR,Guillemaud J,et al.Free tissue transfer flap reconstruction of parotidectomy defects:outcomes analysis and the utility of three-dimensional laser surface scans.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2010;39(5):561-565.

共引文献24

同被引文献19

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部