期刊文献+

经肛门痔上黏膜环切术偏心性切除吻合在直肠良性肿瘤伴抑郁的疗效观察 被引量:1

Transanal resection and anastomosis of PPH eccentric research and application value in the treatment of rectal benign tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经肛门痔上黏膜环切术(procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,PPH)偏心性切除吻合治疗直肠良性肿瘤伴抑郁的效果。方法选取2012年6月到2014年6月住院接受治疗的104例良性肿瘤伴抑郁患者为研究对象,随机数表法分为对照组(50例)与观察组(54例),对照组行传统肛门手术治疗,观察组行经肛门PPH偏心性切除吻合术,比较两组患者的治疗有效率及术后并发症情况。结果治疗后3个月,两组患者病情均好转,观察组的总有效率为96.30%,显著高于对照组的84.0%(P<0.05);观察组患者的术后恢复时间(平均为6.32天)和术后疗效评分(平均为9.36分)均显著优于对照组患者(术后恢复时间平均为10.87天、术后疗效美分平均为7.13分)(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗前的抑郁自评量表(SDS)及焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分相似;其治疗后的SDS及SAS评分明显高于治疗前,且治疗后观察组患者SDS及SAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对于直肠良性肿瘤伴抑郁患者,肛门PPH偏心性切除吻合治疗在其恢复速度、术后并发症及抑郁改善等方面明显优于传统的手术治疗,可能有重要的临床推广价值。 Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of the transanal resection and anastomosis of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) eccentric on rectal benign tumor. Methods One hundred and four patients with rectal benign tumor, complicated with depression, were sampled from June 2012 to June 2014 when treated in the hospital. These patients were randomly divided into control group ( n = 50 ), treated with traditional anal operation, and observation group (n = 54), treated with anal PPH eccentric resection and anastomosis. The effective response rates of the treatment and the complications after the treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The two groups were similar clinically before the treatment. After the treatment for 3 months, the two groups were improved; the total effective response rate of the observation group was 96.30 %, significantly higher than that of the control group ( 84 % )( P〈0.05 ), and the average recovery time of the observation group patients after the treatment ( 6.32 days ) and the scores of postoperative effect ( 9.36 ) were obviously superior to that of the control group patients ( 10.87 days and 7.13, respectively )( P 〈 0.05 ) . As for emotional aspect, the two groups improved in depresion and aniety, and the observation group demonstrated more improvement than did the control group, in according to their scores in the Self-rating depression scale ( SDS ) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale ( SAS ) . Conclusion This study suggests that transanal resection and anastomosis of PPH eccentric has better therapeutic effects on treatment of patients with rectal benign tumor when compared with the traditional anal operation, and may be worthy of generalized application in clinical practice.
出处 《国际精神病学杂志》 2016年第2期319-321,共3页 Journal Of International Psychiatry
关键词 PPH偏心性切除 直肠 良性肿瘤 抑郁 PPH eccentric excision Rectal Benign tumor
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1滕华安,徐良,董家刚,庞显伦.经肛门PPH偏心性切除吻合治疗直肠良性肿瘤[J].中国医药导报,2012,9(8):54-55. 被引量:4
  • 2贾瑞刚,张波,毛宽荣.PPH切除直肠间叶瘤1例报告[J].结直肠肛门外科,2007,13(5):318-319. 被引量:3
  • 3徐忠法.爱必妥联合化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌临床介绍[A].山东抗癌协会肿瘤临床协作分会.山东抗癌协会肿瘤临床协作分会第二次学术年会山东生物医学工程学会生物定向治疗专业委员会第三次学术年会资料汇编[C].山东抗癌协会肿瘤临床协作分会,2009:10(16):150-151.
  • 4赵立.手术病人术前访视及心理护理[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2003(1):42-43. 被引量:3
  • 5王小平.腹腔镜与开发结直肠癌根治术对腹膜结果损伤的前瞻性对照研究.中华外科杂志,2011;(6)243-2443.
  • 6Kim SJ,Ryu GO,Choi BJ,et al.The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.Annals of surgery,2011;254(6):933-940.
  • 7申占龙,叶颖江,谢启伟,姜可伟,王杉.经肛门微创手术在直肠肿瘤中的应用前景[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(5):419-422. 被引量:18
  • 8Matsuda K,Hotta T,Takifuji K,et al.Clinical characteristics of anastomotic leakage after an anterior resection for rectal cancer by assessing of the international classification on anastomotic leakage.Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery,2015;400(2):207-212.
  • 9Kim SJ,Choi BJ,Lee SC.Overview of single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers:past,present,and the future.World journal of gastroenterology:WJG,2014;20(4):997.
  • 10Ahmad J,Khan ZA,Shahab F.Effectiveness of Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids in Immediate Postoperative Period.Journal of Surgery Pakistan(International),2014;19:2.

二级参考文献32

  • 1张胜本,张安平.直肠黏膜内脱垂与脱垂性痔[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2006,26(7):55-57. 被引量:10
  • 2[美]Marin L.Corman 主编.吕厚山主译.结肠与直肠外科学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.814-827.
  • 3Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery : a giant leap forward [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2010,24 : 2200- 2205.
  • 4Atallah S. Transanal total mesorectal excision: full steam ahead [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2015,19:57-61.
  • 5Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56 : 301-307.
  • 6Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, et al. A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013 [J ]. Teeh Coloproetol, 2014,18 : 775-788.
  • 7Heidary B, Phang TP, Raval MJ, et al. Transanal endoscopic: microsurgery : a review[J]. Can J Surg, 2014,57 : 127-138.
  • 8Kennedy ME, Lubowski DZ, King DW. Transanal endoscopic mierosurgery excision: is anoreetal function compromised? [ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45 : 601-604.
  • 9Herman RM, Richter P, Walega 1o, et al. Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic micrusurgery [J]. lnt J Coloreetal Dis, 2001,16: 370-376.
  • 10Lee TG, Lee SJ. Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia [J]. Surg Endosc, 2014,28 : 271-280.

共引文献26

同被引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部