期刊文献+

高管领导行为对组织认知和技术创新绩效的影响:区分高管是否为创始人的实证研究 被引量:8

The Impact of Leadership on Organizational Cognition and Technological Innovation Performance: an Empirical Research of Distinguish Whether Leaders are the Founders or not
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于中国情境,从组织认知的视角揭示企业高管领导行为对技术创新绩效的影响机理,并考察高管是否为企业创始人这一在领导作用机制研究中被忽视的关键情境因素的影响。运用309家企业样本对各变量间关系进行了实证检验。结果如下:(1)高管变革型和交易型领导行为分别对组织创造型认知和分析型认知具有显著正向影响,组织创造型认知和分析型认知分别对技术创新绩效具有显著正向和负向影响;(2)组织创造型认知在高管变革型领导行为与技术创新绩效间起部分中介作用,组织分析型认知在高管交易型领导行为与技术创新绩效间起部分中介作用;(3)当高管是企业创始人时,其领导行为对组织认知的影响效果更为显著。研究将战略领导理论、变革型和交易型领导理论、认知风格理论和技术创新理论进行了有意义的整合,为揭示高管通过组织认知影响技术创新的内部作用机理做出了一定贡献。 Previous research on leadership focused mostly on individual or team level. However, the literature on leadership from the perspective of the whole organization is rare. The existing research is still in the preliminary stage to explore the effect of mediators and moderators on the relationship between leadership and technological innovation performance. In addition, the current literature ignores to distinguish whether top leaders are founders or not. This article intends to develop new theories to close the knowledge gap. In the context of Chinese companies, this article explores the effect of leadership behavior on technological innovation performance from the perspective of organizational cognition. Moreover, this study distinguishes whether leaders are founders or not. After analyzing data collected from 309 companies in China, we found that transformation and transaction leadership have significant effect on organizational creative cognition and analytic cognition, respectively. Organizational creative cognition and analytic cognition have significant positive and negative effect on technological innovation performance, respectively. Organizational creative cognition partially mediates the relationship between transformation leadership and technological innovation performance. Organizational analytic cognition partially mediates the relationship between transaction leadership and technology innovation performance. When leaders are founders, their leadership significantly affects organizational cognition. This paper makes three contributions to the current literature. First, Chinese society has a strong culture of centralized power. In this culture, this study breaks through the dominant research paradigm on the Upper Echelon Theory that focuses on TMT, and explores the mechanism with which top individual leaders impact technological innovation performance. Our study enriches the leadership theory. Second, In order to be more helpful in revealing the mechanism with which top leaders affect technological innovation performance, this study introduces organizational cognition as a mediating factor, including both cognitive properties and long-term stability variables, to verify the mediating effect of organizational cognition. This study provides an explanation from the perspective of cognitive psychology to uncover the "black box" relationship between leadership behavior and technological innovation performance. Third, this study is also the first attempt to validate the crucial role of founders in organizational cognition and technology innovation performance. By verifying the influence of founders or non-founders, this study provides insights that found-leaders may be an important driving force for the operation of technological innovation performance. This study integrates many theories, including strategic leadership theory, transformation and transaction leadership theory entrepreneurship theory, cognitive style theory and technology innovation theory. In addition, this study makes contributions to the current literature on the internal mechanism with which top leaders impact technological innovation performance via organizational cognition.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期1-8,共8页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372171) 山西省软科学研究资助项目(2014041051-3)
关键词 领导行为 创始人 组织认知 技术创新绩效 leadership behavior founder organizational cognition technological innovation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Hambrick D C. Upper Echelons Theory: An Update[J]. The Academy of Management Review. 2007, 32(2): 334-343.
  • 2陈建勋.不同维度下高层变革型领导行为影响效果的实证研究[J].经济科学,2010(1):52-61. 被引量:8
  • 3Carter S M, Greer C R. Strategic Leadership: Values, Styles, and Or-ganizational Performance[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2013, 20(4): 375-393.
  • 4Bettis R A, Gambardella A, Helfat C, et al. Theory in strategic man- agement[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2014, 3500): 1411-1413.
  • 5Makri M, Scandura T A. Exploring the effects of creative CEO lead- ership on innovation in high-technology firms[J]. The Leadership Quarterly. 2010, 21(I): 75-88.
  • 6Vera D,Crossan M. Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learn- ing[J]. The Academy of Management Review. 2004, 29(2): 222-240.
  • 7Scott S G, Bruce R A. Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace[J]. The Academy of Managcmant Journal. 1994, 37(3): 580-607.
  • 8Jung D I, Chow C, Wu A. The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some prelimi- nary findings[J]. The Leadership Quarterly. 2003, 14(4-5): 525-544.
  • 9Begley T M. Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers of smaller businesses[J]. Journal of Business Venturing. 1995, 10(3): 249-263.
  • 10白云涛,王亚刚,席酉民.多层级领导对员工信任、工作绩效及创新行为的影响模式研究[J].管理工程学报,2008,22(3):24-29. 被引量:36

二级参考文献159

  • 1杨治良,郭力平.认知风格的研究进展[J].心理科学,2001,24(3):326-329. 被引量:152
  • 2徐志强,席酉民,肖宏文.组织对团队信任及相关影响因素的分析[J].管理评论,2006,18(1):37-44. 被引量:12
  • 3陈永霞,贾良定,李超平,宋继文,张君君.变革型领导、心理授权与员工的组织承诺:中国情景下的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(1):96-105. 被引量:209
  • 4李华晶,张玉利.高管团队特征与企业创新关系的实证研究——以科技型中小企业为例[J].商业经济与管理,2006(5):9-13. 被引量:103
  • 5Mie S Augier, and D Sarasvathy. Integrating cognition, evolution, and design: Extending Simonian perspectives to strategic organization[J]. Strategic Organization, 2004, 2(2): 169-204.
  • 6Antonio, Strati. Understanding cognition in organization studies[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1998, 14(4): 309--329.
  • 7Jonathan Gosling, and Henry Mintzberg. The five minds of a manager[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2003, 81(11/12): 54--63.
  • 8Bart Nooteboom. Beyond Penrose: A cognitive theory of the firm[R]. Discussion Paper 34, Tilburg University, Center tor Economic Research, 2006.
  • 9Siegwart M Lindenberg. Governance seen from a framing point of view: The employment relationship and relational signaling[A], in Bart Nootehoom, and Frederique E Six (Eds.). The trust process in organizations: Empirical studies of the determinants and the process of trust development[C]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003: 37-- 57.
  • 10Z Shapira. Governance in organizations: A cognitive perspective[J]. Journal of Management and Governance, 2000, 4 (1/2) : 53--67.

共引文献90

同被引文献135

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部