期刊文献+

论防空识别区的性质——“灰色地带”的成因与特点 被引量:1

On the Nature of Air Defense Identification Zone:Causes and Characteristics of the Grey Area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 防空识别区起源于20世纪50年代,是沿海国为维护国家安全而在领海以外水域上方划定的一定空域,其虽然是对空域的划定但却以领海基线为起点。囿于经济驱动的不足以及安全利益的弱化,该制度始终未能通过国际条约或者国际习惯确立其法律地位,这就使得防空识别区作为国家主权权利的拓展无法得到国际法的有效保障,而成为国家权利的"灰色地带"。防空识别区具有剩余性、技术性、辅助性和沿海性等特点。根据对等原则,任何已经建立防空识别区的国家都不应当对我国的防空识别区制度提出质疑。深入理解防空识别区的这些性质和特点对于我国防空识别区建设具有重要意义。 Air Defense Identification Zone( ADIZ),originated in the 1950 s,is an area of airspace over water established by the coastal states for the safeguard of national security. Although it is an area established in the air,it starts with the territorial sea baseline. However,as a result of the insufficient economic driving force and the diminished security interests,ADIZ has never established its legal status through treaties or customary international law. This makes the ADIZ,as an expansion of national sovereign rights,can not be guaranteed effectively by the international law and become a "grey area"of national rights. Some words can be used to describe the characteristics of ADIZ,like "residual","technical","assistant"and "coastal".According to the principle of reciprocity,any other country that has established ADIZ should not question the regulations of ADIZ in our country. The deep understanding of its nature and the characteristics has important implications for the establishment of ADIZ in our country.
机构地区 武汉大学
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期24-31,共8页 Pacific Journal
基金 2013年教育部人文社会科学重点基地重大项目"东海南海的岛屿主权与海洋划界争端中的国际法问题"(13JJD820008)的资助
关键词 防空识别区 “灰色地带” 剩余性 技术性 辅助性 沿海性 ADIZ Grey Area remaining area technical zone assistant area coastal area
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1See Kristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, "China Announces New Air Defense Identification Zone Over East China Sea, Prompting U. S. Response", American Journal of International Law, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2014, p. 108.
  • 2See Pedrozo, Raul, "Bull in the China Shop: Raising Ten- sions in the Asia-Pacific Region", International Law Studies, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2014, p. 74.
  • 3See Hailbronner, Kay, "Freedom of the Air and the Conven- tion on the Law of the Sea", American Journal of International Law, Vol. 77, No. 3, 1983, p. 518.
  • 4罗国强.《中日东海问题原则共识》与东海共同开发——结合钓鱼岛与防空识别区问题的讨论[J].法学论坛,2015,30(1):37-44. 被引量:4
  • 514 Code of Federal Regulations, 2004, 99. 3.
  • 6See Sheets, Michele S. , "From ADIZ to SFRA: The FAA's Compliance with Administrative Procedures to Codify Washington, D. C. Flight Restrictions", Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2006, p. 620.
  • 7See Richard A. Posner, Economics of Justice, Harvard Uni- versity Press, 1983, p. 115.
  • 8See Cuadra, Elizabeth, "Air Defense Identification Zones: Creeping Jurisdiction in the Airspace", Virginia Journal of Internation- al Law, Vo|. 18, No. 3, 1978, p. 496.
  • 9See Lotus Case, Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10, pp. 10 -12.
  • 10[荷]I·H·PH·迪德里克斯-范思赫,黄韬,等译.《国际航空法》(第九版),上海交通大学出版社,2014年版,第10页.

二级参考文献74

共引文献25

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部