期刊文献+

城市非农用地碳排放驱动因素的PDA模型

PDA Model Decomposing of Driving Forces of CO_2 Emissions of Urban Non-agricultural Land from the Perspective of the Production System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从生产系统角度构建全面分解城市非农用地碳排放驱动因素的PDA模型。基于非参数距离函数和环境DEA生产技术,借助生产分解分析的方法将中国28个省区市的城市非农用地碳排放的驱动因素分解到三个层次。结果表明,全国水平的技术进步、农用地利用结构碳强度、潜在非农用地利用强度、期望产出和非期望产出绩效是正向驱动;规模效应、技术效率、资本投入绩效、劳动投入绩效和非农用地投入绩效是负向驱动。三大区域的正负驱动因素与之稍有不同。因此,提高资源的投入绩效和技术效率是缓解城市非农用地碳排放的关键。 This paper fully reveals the driving forces of CO2 emissions of the urban non-agricultural land based on the PDA model from the perspective of the production system. Based on the non-parameter distance function and the environmental DEA production technology, it decomposes the driving forces of the urban non-agricultural land of the China' s 28 provinces into three levels by the Index Decomposition Analysis. The results show that the pos- itive driving forces are the technical progress, the carbon intensity of the agricultural land use structure, the utili- zation intensity of the potential non-agricultural land, the expected outputs and the unexpected outputs perform- ance ; the negative driving forces are the scale effect, the technical efficiency, the investment performance of the capital stock, the labor and the non-agricultural land on the national level while it is a slightly different in driving forces in three large regions. So it is crucial to alleviate CO2 emissions of the urban non-agricultural land by improving the input performance and the technical efficiency of the input resources utilization.
作者 崔玮 王三银
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期156-164,共9页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71203097) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(08BJY014)
关键词 运筹学 单目标规划 PDA模型 DEA技术 碳排放 城市非农用地 operational research single objective programming PDA model DEA technology CO2 emission urban non-agricultural land
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Turner B L, Skole D L, Sanderson S, et al. Land-use and land-cover change, science/research plan [ J ]. Global Change Report, 1995, 35 : 108-123.
  • 2Woomer P L, Tieszen L L. Land use change and terres- trial carbon stocks in senegal [ J ]. Journal of Arid Envi- ronments, 2004, 59 : 625-642.
  • 3Keith P, Vernon C C. CO2 mitigation by agriculture: an overview[ J]. Climatic Change, 1998, 40: 135-162.
  • 4Houghton R A, Hacker J L, Lawrence K T. The U. S. carbon budget: contributions from land use change [ J]. Science, 1999, 23(285): 574-578.
  • 5Houghton R A. Releases of carbon to the atmosphere from degradation of forests in tropical asia [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1991, 21 : 132-142.
  • 6BiceksI, Jeleccek L, Stepanek V. Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries[J]. Land Use Policy, 2001, 18( 1 ) : 65-73.
  • 7Krausmann F, Haber H, Schulz N B, et al. Land-use change and soeio-economie metabolism in austria-part I: driving forces of land-use change: 1950- 1995 [J]. Land Use Policy, 2003, 20(1) : 1-20.
  • 8Olson J M, Alagarswamy G, Andresen J A, et al. Integating diverse methods to understand climate-land interactions in east africa[J]. Geoforum, 2008, 39(2) : 898-911.
  • 9Ann V, Eric V R. Environmental assessment tools for multi-scale land resources information systems a case study of rwanda[ J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Envi- ronment, 2006, 114(2-4) : 170-184.
  • 10Bruno V, Andree E D P, Suseno B. Factors driving land use change: effects on watershed functions in a coffee agro forestry system in lampung, sumatra [ J ]. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 85 (3) : 254-270.

二级参考文献170

共引文献3295

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部