期刊文献+

时间距离和损益概率对听障大学生风险偏好的影响

The Effect of Time Distance and Probability on the Risky Choice of the Hearing-impaired College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章使用生命决策任务,考察了不同时间距离、损益概率对听障大学生社会风险决策偏好的影响。结果表明,听障被试的风险偏好不同于健听被试,在不同时间距离、概率条件下听障被试都倾向于冒险,表现出经典框架效应;在远时间距离条件下,听障被试比健听被试更倾向于冒险;其他条件下,听障被试和健听被试的决策结果都没有表现出显著差异。文章在此基础上探讨了听障大学生社会认知的特点,并提出教育干预策略。 This study investigated the effects of the time distance and probability on the life risky task. The results showed that the hearing-impaired subjects' risk preferences were different from the hearing subjects'. In different time distance and probability conditions,the hearing-impaired subjects showed more risk seeking than hearing subjects,there are non-significant differences in the framework of two types of participants. On this basis,we explored the characteristics of social decision of the hearing-impaired students and proposed intervention strategies.
出处 《现代特殊教育》 2016年第8期77-80,共4页 Modern Special Education
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金重点项目"特殊儿童视知觉加工特征及教育干预策略的眼动研究"(项目编号:10SZZD04)的研究成果之一
关键词 时间距离 损益概率 风险偏好 听障大学生 time distance probability risky preferences the hearing-impaired
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1水仁德,骆中慧.听障学生社会认知发展的影响因素研究[J].浙江社会科学,2007(2):118-122. 被引量:8
  • 2贺荟中.聋人儿童的发展与教育[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
  • 3钟毅平,谭千保,方柳.听障学生与正常学生社会认知能力的比较研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):73-75. 被引量:16
  • 4Staple,D.Semin,G.The Magic Spell of Language : Linguistic Categories and Their Perceptual Consequences [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2007 (93) : 23-33.
  • 5Tversky A,Kahneman D.The Framing of Decisions andthe Psychology of Choice [J].Science,1981 (211) : 453- 458.
  • 6Vasari C. ,Marschark,M.Communication Between Parents and Deaf Children: Implications for SocialemotionalDevelopment[J].Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,1997 (38) ,793 - 802.
  • 7Fujita,K. ,Trope,Y. ,Lieberman,N. , & Levin-Sagi,M.Construal Levels and Serf-control [J].Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology,2006(90) :351 -367.

二级参考文献27

  • 1林崇德,张文新.认知发展与社会认知发展[J].心理发展与教育,1996,12(1):50-55. 被引量:24
  • 2钟毅平,谭千保,方柳.听障学生与正常学生社会认知能力的比较研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):73-75. 被引量:16
  • 3Gnepp J, Chilamkurti C. Children' s use of personality attribution to predict other people's emotional and behavioral reactions. Child Development,1988,59:734- 754.
  • 4Hollos A, Cowan P A. Social isolation and cognitive development:Logical operations and role- taking abilities in three Norwagian social settings. Child Development, 1973,44:630 - 641.
  • 5West H. Early peer- group interaction and role - taking skills: An investigation of Israeli children. Child Development,1974,44 : 1118- 1121.
  • 6Edelstein W, Keller M, Wahlen K. Structure and content in social cognition: Conceptual and empirical analysis. Child Development, 1988,55 : 1514 - 1526.
  • 7Rubin K.Role taking in childhood:Some methodlogical considerations.Child development,1978,49:428-433
  • 8Kitano,M K,Stiehl,J,& Cole,J T Role taking implication for special education Journal of Special Education,1978,12:59-74
  • 9徐震.《关于第二次全国残疾人抽样调查浙江省主要数据情况的通报》,http://www.zhejiang.gov.cn/
  • 10Kursche,C.A,& Greenberg,M.T.(1983).The development of evaluative understanding and role-taking in deaf and hearing children.Child Development,54,141-147.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部