期刊文献+

“大海洋法”课程体系的构建——基于淮海工学院创建“江苏海洋大学”的思考 被引量:3

Construction of the Curricula of“Broadly-defined Maritime Law”:Reflections on the Strategy of Huaihai Institute of Technology of Building“Jiangsu Ocean University”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 课程体系是教育教学的重要依据,也是人才培养质量的关键因素。经过多年积累,淮海工学院法学专业海洋法建设已具备一定的基础,但在培养目标定位、课程体系结构、课程内容安排和课程教学形式等方面仍存在不足,无法适应发挥工科院校法学专业竞争优势、助力淮海工学院创建"江苏海洋大学"、服务连云港市"一带一路"交汇点建设和江苏海洋开发战略的需要。基于此,提出应拓宽海洋法研究的内容与研究视野,从多个方面构建和完善"大海洋法"课程体系,形成全方位海洋法人才培养机制。 Curricula provide an important basis for education and teaching activities,which are also critical factors to the quality of the talent-training.After years of accumulation,on one hand,the law school of Huaihai Institute of Technology already has a foundation in the maritime laws;on the other hand,there are still some defects in the orientation of training goal,the structure,content and teaching method of curricula,which are unable to meet the needs of playing a competitive advantage for the law major in technical institutes,contributing to establishing"Jiangsu Ocean University",serving to "One Belt and One Road"intersection construction and Jiangsu coastal development.Therefore,the paper advocates broadening the research perspective and content of maritime laws,constructing and improving the curricula of"Broadlydefined Maritime Law"in many respects,in order to establish a comprehensive mechanism of talent-training,and contribute to achieve the goal of establishing"Jiangsu Ocean University"in the near future.
作者 李敏
出处 《淮海工学院学报(人文社会科学版)》 2016年第3期136-140,共5页 Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
基金 淮海工学院教学改革研究课题(XJG2013-3-34)
关键词 “大海洋法” 淮海工学院 课程体系 科研平台 培养目标 "Broadly-defined Maritime Law" Huaihai Institute of Technology curricula research platform training goal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献18

  • 1董泽芳,张继平.地方高校服务社会的价值取向[J].高校教育管理,2007,1(3):12-16. 被引量:69
  • 2戴本博.外国教育史(上)[M].人民教育出版社,1989:263.
  • 3陈侠.课程论[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1989..
  • 4江山野主编.简明国际教育百科全书·课程[M].T.Husen el.ed.,1985.北京:教育科学出版社,1991.30.
  • 5胡建华.中国大学课程体系改革分析[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2007(3):76-81. 被引量:50
  • 6傅维利,刘伟.培养目标、教育要素与教育成本[J].高等教育研究,2007,28(10):52-56. 被引量:5
  • 7Kuan-Chun Chang, The Teaching of Law in the United States: Studies on the Case and Socratic Methods in Comparison with Traditional Taiwan Residents Pedagogy, 4 Nat'l Taiwan U. L. Rev. 1,2009(3): 1-23.
  • 8JosephA. Dickinson, Understanding the Socratic in Law School Teaching After the Carnegie Foundation's Educating Lawyers, 31 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 97, 2009:97-121.
  • 9Daniel J. Dye: Debucking the Socratic Method?: Not so Fast, My Friend! 3 Phoenix L. Rev. 351,2010(3): 351-386.
  • 10Myron Moskovitz, Beyond the Case Method: It's Time to Teach with Problems, 42 J. LEGAL EDUC. 241,250 (1992).

共引文献48

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部