期刊文献+

中医医院初级职称护理人员中医护理培训评估体系的构建 被引量:15

Construction of TCM nursing training evaluation system for primary title of nursing personnel in TCM hospital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]构建符合中医医院发展需求的初级职称护理人员中医护理培训评估体系。[方法]采用自行设计的问卷咨询表,选取中医药大学中医护理教育者、中医院护理管理、中医临床护理专家共20名进行德尔菲专家咨询法调查,以柯氏模型为导向构建符合中医医院发展需求的初级职称护理人员中医护理培训评估体系。[结果]经过两轮咨询后确定的评估体系中,一级指标4项、二级指标11项、三级指标34项;两轮咨询专家的积极系数分别为91.7%及83.3%,专家权威系数为0.764,一级、二级、三级指标的专家肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.144,0.214,0.208(P<0.05)。[结论]本研究专家积极性、权威程度、协调程度均较高,确立了包括一级指标4项、二级指标11项、三级指标34项的中医医院初级职称护理人员中医护理培训评估体系。 Objective:To construct the TCM nursing training evaluation system for primary title of nursing personnel,which was suitable for the development needs of TCM hospital.Methods:The self-designed questionnaire form were adopted,and 20 TCM nursing educaters from TCM university,TCM nursing managers,TCM clinical nursing specialist were selected for survey.It constructed the TCM nursing training evaluation system for primary title of nursing personnel fitting development needs of the TCM hospitals according to the Ke's model.Results:The evaluation system consisted of 4first class indicators,11 second class indicators and 34 third class indicaters after two rounds of consultation.The experts' positivity coefficient in the two rounds was 91.7% and83.3%respectively.The experts' authority coefficient was 0.764.The experts' Kendall harmonious coefficients in the first,second and third indicators were 0.144,0.214,0.208respectively(P〈0.05).Conclusion:In this study,the experts' positivity,authority and coordination of TCM were higher.It established the TCM nursing training evaluation system for primary title of nursing personnel in TCM hospitals,which included 4first class indicators,11 second class indicators and 34 third class indicators.
出处 《护理研究(上旬版)》 2016年第5期1572-1576,共5页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
基金 2014年浙江省中医药优秀青年人才基金项目 编号:2014ZQ009
关键词 中医医院 初级职称 护理人员 在职培训 评估体系 TCM hospital primary title nursing personnel on-the-job training evaluation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献25

  • 1石鹏建.适应医学教育标准国际化,积极推进我国医学教育改革[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(7):505-508. 被引量:71
  • 2宋夕平.浅析柯氏模型在培训效果评估中的运用[J].科技管理研究,2007,27(2):244-245. 被引量:35
  • 3Donald L. Kirkpatrick, James D. Kirkpatrick. Evaluating training programs: the four levels[ M]. Business & Economics, 2006.379.
  • 4Ronald M. Epstein. Assessment in Medical Education[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007,356: 387-396.
  • 5D A Davis, PE Mazmanian, M Fordis et. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review [J]. JAMA, 2006,296:1094-1102.
  • 6格拉斯.职业教育学与劳动教育学(陈用仪译〉[M].北京:劳动人事部培训就业局、天津职业技术师范学院,1985.12-13.
  • 7许燕卿,阮国有.香港中西护理融合的机会与挑战[A].2006年国 际传统护理学术研讨会论文集[C].北京..北京中医药大学,2006. 38-42.
  • 8Firmstone VR,Elley KM,Skrybant MT, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of continuing dental professional develop- ment on learning,behavior,or patient outcomes [J]. J Dent Educ ,2013,77 (3) :300-315.
  • 9Wolf L,Lukas H,Matthias N,et al. Swiss Cancer League com- munication skills training programme for oncology nurses:an evaluation [ J ]. J Adv Nurs, 2010,66 (10) : 2266-2277.
  • 10Tahereh E,Mana M. Assessment of instructors' readiness for implementing e-learning in continuing medical education in Iran [J ]. Medical Teacher, 2010,32 : e407-e412.

共引文献74

同被引文献150

引证文献15

二级引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部