期刊文献+

基于主动学习Kriging模型的可靠性分析 被引量:9

Reliability Analysis Based on Active Learning Kriging Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 论文采用Kriging模型代替结构真实功能函数,引入主动学习函数,序列选择最佳样本点,在每次迭代中加入最佳样本点更新Kriging模型.与直接的蒙特卡洛方法相比,主动学习Kriging模型仅需要少量的结构分析就能够得到精度较高的可靠度结果,适用于实际工程具有隐式功能函数的结构可靠性分析.论文通过三个数学算例,从最佳样本点的分布情况、功能函数的拟合程度及可靠度计算结果出发对四种学习函数进行对比研究,最后对具有隐式功能函数的悬臂板进行可靠度分析.结果表明,主动学习函数的引入,合理选择了Kriging模型所需的样本,提高了计算效率,同时,学习函数的选择对结构可靠性分析结果也存在影响. In practical engineering,structural reliability analysis is usually characterized with implicit performance functions and time-consuming structural responses.It is not efficient to utilize Monte Carlo simulation that requires a large number of samples.Aiming at this issue,the original structural performance function is approximated using the Kriging model.However,to obtain an accurate Kriging model with a large number of samples,the computation cost is increased.Therefore,the active learning method is utilized to sequentially select a best next point to update the original Kriging model progressively.An accurate reliability result can be obtained with few sample points in comparison with the direct Monte Carlo simulation,indicating apotential of the proposed method for reliability analysis with implicit performance function.Four different learning functions are introduced in this paper,and the corresponding distribution of the best next points,the approximation of performance functions and the accuracy of reliability results are compared through three numerical examples.And finally,reliability analysis for a cantilever plate with an implicit performance function is carried out.The results demonstrate that the computation efficiency is improved by utilizing the Kriging model combined with active learning methods.The accuracy of reliability result is found to be affected by the choice of active learning functions.
出处 《固体力学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期172-180,共9页 Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(11572134) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2011CB013800)资助
关键词 可靠性分析 主动学习 KRIGING模型 最佳样本点 reliability analysis active learning Kriging model best next point
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Melchers R E. Structural Reliability Analysis and Pre- dictions[M], New York: Wiley, 1999:124-156.
  • 2Nowak A S, Collins K R. Reliability of Structures [M]. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2000 : 32-35.
  • 3Faravelli L. Response surface approach for reliability analysis [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1989, 115: 1763-1781.
  • 4Gomes H M, Awruch A M. Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis [J]. Structural Safety, 2004, 26(1): 49-57.
  • 5Cherkassky V, Ma Y. Practical selection of SVM pa- rameters and noise estimation for SVM regression [J]. Neural Networks, 2004, 17 (1): 113-126.
  • 6Matherton G. Principles of geostatistics [ J] . Eco- nomic Geology, 1963, 58 (8): 1246-1266.
  • 7蒋水华,李典庆,方国光.结构可靠度分析的响应面法和随机响应面法的比较[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2012,45(1):46-53. 被引量:23
  • 8Kaymaz I. Application of kriging method to structur- al reliability problems[J]. Structural Safety, 2005, 27(2) : 133-151.
  • 9张崎,李兴斯.结构可靠性分析的模拟重要抽样方法[J].工程力学,2007,24(1):33-36. 被引量:13
  • 10Balesdent M, Morio J, Marzat J. Kriging-based a- daptive importance sampling algorithms for rare event estimation[J]. Structural Safety, 2013, 44: 1-10.

二级参考文献21

共引文献34

同被引文献54

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部