非英语专业大学生英语写作语言表达反馈能力差异研究被引量：2

A Study of Language Expression Feedback Difference in College English Writing

下载PDF

导出

摘要语言表达是有效文本交际的重要保障,语言表达反馈是写作反馈的重要组成部分,是大学英语写作教学关注的焦点。本研究对93名不同类别非英语专业大学生英语写作语言表达反馈能力差异进行了实证研究后发现:1)就语言表达整体反馈能力而言,女大学生十分显著性地强于男大学生、文科大学生非常显著性地强于理科大学生、高水平大学生显著性地强于低水平大学生;2)就语言表达反馈能力的具体差异而言,"语义表达不符合英语习惯"和"词性、单复数"不仅是影响整体反馈能力水平高低而且是导致具体反馈能力强弱差异的主要方面。这一研究发现为创新个性化大学英语写作教学提供了依据。 Language expression is an important guarantee of effective communication and language expression feedback is an indispensable part of writing feedback, which is also a focus for college English teaching of writing. An empirical study of 93 non-English majors＇ language expression feedback ability in college English writing indicates that, in the aspect of the overall feedback abilities of language expression, female students, liberal arts majors and high language achievers are stronger than male students, natural science majors and low language achievers. In the field of the specific feedback differences of language expression, ＂correct semantics expression＂ and ＂singulars or plurals and wording＂ are the major aspects that not only affect the overall feedback abilities but also cause the feedback ability differences. It is expected that the findings of the study can provide references for individualized teaching of college English writing.

作者李莉叶建敏

机构地区南通大学外国语学院苏州大学外国语学院

出处《山东外语教学》 2016年第2期58-64,共7页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

关键词英语写作语言表达反馈能力差异 English writing language expression feedback ability difference

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1Ashwell, T. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom : Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2000, (3) :227 - 257.
2Bitchener, J. , S. Young. & D. Cameron. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing[ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2005, (14) : 191 - 205.
3Chandler, J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of I2 student writing [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2003, ( 12 ) : 267 - 296.
4Chiang, S. The importance of cohesive conditions to perceptions of writing quality at the early stages of foreign language learning [ J ]. System, 2003, ( 31 ) :471 - 484.
5Ellis, R. , Y. Sheen, M. Murakami & H. Takashima. The effects of focused and unfoeused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context [ J ]. System, 2008, (36) :353 -371.
6Ferris, D. R. Response to Student Writing : Implications for Second-Language Students [ M ]. Mahwah : Lawrence Elbaum Associates,Inc. , 2003.
7Keh, C. L. Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation [ J ]. ELT Journal, 1990, (4) :294 - 394.
8Mei, T. & Q. Yuan. A ease study of peer feedback in a Chinese EFL writing classroom [ J ]. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2010, (4) :87 -98.
9Min, H. The effects of trained peer review on EFL Students' revision types and writing quality[ J ]. Journal of Second IxmKuage Writing, 2006, ( 15 ) : 118 - 141.
10Qi, D. S. & S. Lapkin. Exploring the role of noticing in a three - stage second language writing task [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2001, ( 10 ) : 277 - 303.