期刊文献+

腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果观察 被引量:8

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析腹腔镜(LA)与传统开腹(OA)手术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果。方法:选取笔者所在医院2008年5月-2014年11月收治的结直肠癌患者194例,其中LA组106例采用腹腔镜手术,OA组88例采用传统开腹手术。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间、综合治疗费用、清除淋巴结数、开始进流质饮食时间、开始进固体饮食时间、留置导尿管时间、术后并发症发生情况、镇痛药使用情况及局部转移情况。结果:LA组术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、开始进流质饮食时间、开始进固体饮食时间、留置导尿管时间及住院时间均明显优于OA组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);LA组术后镇痛药物的使用率及总并发症发生率均明显低于OA组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);但LA组的综合治疗费用明显高于OA组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对于结直肠癌患者,与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜结直肠癌手术具有安全性高、恢复速度快的优势,值得临床推广,但同时也存在手术费用相对较高的缺点。
作者 李庆文
机构地区 长治县人民医院
出处 《中外医学研究》 2016年第13期114-116,共3页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张广坛,宋玉成,袁远,宋笑飞,张鹏,张学东.手助腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中间入路与外侧入路的对照研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2012,27(12):1027-1028. 被引量:17
  • 2Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al.Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005, 48(12): 2217-2223.
  • 3连彦军,王元杰,徐宁,黄传江,赵小军,尤小兰.腹腔镜辅助右半结肠全系膜切除术16例体会[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2013,6(2):42-44. 被引量:16
  • 4Mehta P P, Griffin J, Ganta S, et al.Laparoscopic-assisted colon resections: long-term results and survival[J].JSLS, 2005, 9(2) : 184-188.
  • 5Gayet B, Cavaliere D, Castel B, et al.Laparoscopic liver surgery for metastases of colo rectal cancer: analysis of a monocentric ex perience[J]. SupplTumori, 2005, 4(3): $135-S137.
  • 6Reza M M, Blasco J A, Andradas E, et al.Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer[J].Br J Surg, 2006, 93(8): 921-928.
  • 7郑民华,马君俊.腹腔镜外科在争议中发展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(5):503-505. 被引量:51
  • 8Kuhry E, Schwenk W, C, aupset R, et al.Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochranesy stematic review of randomised controlled trials[J].Cancer Treat Rev, 2008, 34(6): 498-504.
  • 9Liang Y, Li G, Chen P, et al.Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis of results of randomized controlled trials on recurrence[J].Eur J Surg Oncol, 2008, 34(11): 1217-1224.
  • 10Rosenberg J, Harvald T, Haglind E.Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal ex cision for rectal cancer[J].Ugeskr Laeger, 2007, 169(43): 3652-3655.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Kitano S,Shiraishi N.Minimally invasive surgery for gastric tumors[J].Surg Clin North Am,2005; 85(1):151.
  • 2Heemskerk J,van Gemert WG,Greve JW,et al.Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication:a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2007; 17(1):1.
  • 3DeNoto G,Rubach E,Ravikumar TS.A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2006; 16(6):551.
  • 4Rockall TA,Darzi A.Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J].Surg Clin North Am,2003; 83(6):1463.
  • 5Janson M,Bjorholt I,Carlsson P,et al.Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer[J].Br J Surg,2004; 91(4):409.
  • 6Draaisma WA,Buskens E,Bais JE,et al.Randomized clinical trial and follow-up study of cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplication[J].Br J Surg,2006; 93(6):690.
  • 7Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group.A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2004; 350(20):2050.
  • 8Lacy AM,Garcia-Valdecasas JC,Delgado S,et al.Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:a randomised trial[J].Lancet,2002; 359(9325):2224.
  • 9Adachi Y,Shiraishi N,Shiromizu A,et al.Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth Ⅰ gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy[J].Arch Surg,2000; 135(7):806.
  • 10Lee SI,Choi YS,Park DJ,et al.Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy[J].J Am Coll Surg,2006; 202(6):874.

共引文献80

同被引文献100

引证文献8

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部