期刊文献+

基于因子分析的土壤肥力综合评价 被引量:7

Integrated Evaluation of Soil Fertility Based on Factor Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了给施甸县烟区特色优质烟叶生产提供科学合理施肥方案,本文利用因子分析法和系统聚类分析法对施甸县植烟土壤养分进行了分析与综合评价。结果表明,土壤肥力最高的12个样本(占总样本的14.81%),综合得分F∈[0.623 6,1.261 3];土壤肥力较高的32个样本(占总样本的39.51%),综合得分F∈[0.008 4,0.503 0];土壤肥力较低的23个样本(占总样本的28.40%),综合得分F∈[-0.514 1,-0.051 8];土壤肥力最低的14个样本(占总样本的17.28%),综合得分F∈[-1.043 7,-0.565 3]。因此,鉴于全县植烟土壤肥力存在着较大差异,对土壤肥力较高的田地,要施用适量有机肥和复合肥;而土壤肥力处于较低水平的,则要足量、配合施用有机肥和复合肥。 The soil nutrient was analysed and evaluated by the method of factor and system cluster in this paper, in order to provide scientific and reasonable fertilization scheme for characteristic and high-quality tobacco production in Shidian tobacco-growing areas.The results showed that the soil fertility of twelve samples (14.81% of the total)was the highest with comprehensive scores from 0.623 6 to 1.261 3 ;thirty-two samples (39.51% of the total )was the second with comprehensive scores from 0.008 4 to 0.503 0 ; twenty-three samples (28.40% of the total)was the third with comprehensive scores from -0.514 1 to -0.051 8 ;fourteen samples (17.28% of the total)was the lowest with comprehensive scores from -1.043 7 to -0.565 3. Therefore,in view of great difference in soil fertility through Shidian tobacco-growing areas,the right amount of organic fertilizer and compound fertilizer are applied to the fields of high soil fertility, and plenty of organic fertilizer and compound fertilizer are used for the fields of low soil fertility.
出处 《现代农业科技》 2016年第7期228-230,共3页 Modern Agricultural Science and Technology
关键词 因子分析 系统聚类分析 土壤肥力 综合评价 云南施甸 factor analysis system cluster analysis soil fertility integrated evaluation Shidian Yunnan
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1周健民.农田养分平衡与管理[M].南京:河海大学出版社,2000.82-84.
  • 2王林,卢秀萍,肖汉乾,黎妍妍,许自成.浏阳植烟土壤肥力状况的综合评价[J].河南农业大学学报,2006,40(6):597-601. 被引量:21
  • 3黄燕翔,刘淑欣,熊德中,陈淑婷,邱志丹.福建烟区土壤条件与烤烟品质的关系[J].福建农业大学学报,1995,24(2):201-204. 被引量:39
  • 4ROM D E,GARLYNDM J,HARRIS R F.Farmer-based Assessment of Soi Quality:A Soil Health Scorecard[C]//DORAN J W,JONES A J.Methods for AssessingSoil Quality.Madison, USA: Soil Science Society of America, 1996: 39-60.
  • 5REGANOLD J P.Comparison of Soil Properties as Influenced by Organic and Conventional Farming System[J].Am J Alternative Agric, 1989,3: 144-155.
  • 6LARSON W E,PIERCE F J.The Dynamics of Soil Quality as a Measure of Sustainable Management[C]//DORAN J W, COLEMAN D C, BEZDICK D F,et al.Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment.Madison, USA : Soil Science Society of America, 1994 : 37-52.
  • 7DORAN J W,PARKIN T B.Defining and AssessingSoil Quality[C]// Doran J W,Coleman D C ,Bezdick D F ,et al.Defining Soil Quality for a Sus-tainable Environment.Madison,USA:Soil Science Soci-ety of America, 1994: 3-21.
  • 8SMITH J L,HALVORSON J J,PAPENDICK R I.Using Multiple- variable Indicator Kriging for Evaluating Soil Quality[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1993,57:743-749.
  • 9阚文杰,吴启堂.一个定量综合评价土壤肥力的方法初探[J].土壤通报,1994,25(6):245-247. 被引量:188
  • 10刘梦云,安韶山,常庆瑞,刘举.宁南山区不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价方法研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(3):41-43. 被引量:14

二级参考文献91

共引文献326

同被引文献113

引证文献7

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部