知识产权案例指导制度实践样本--北京知识产权法院庭审实质化诉讼改革

The Fundamental Problems Concerning Establishment of the Rule In Accordance With the Precedent Intellectual Property Cases: The Positivity Research Focusing on Judicial Reformation of the Beijing Intellectual Property Court

最高人民法院在北京知识产权法院设立基地,建立中国特色的知识产权案例指导制度(或称判例制),已经取得较高的学术共识。该制度的建立,需要解决外部社会条件或体制条件,以及司法先例制度本身建设两大基础性问题。北京知识产权法院在审判权运行机制改革基础上,推行以"诉、审、判一致性"为核心的诉讼制度改革,解决了以法官独立审判为核心的司法体制条件问题和判例制度自身建设的审判程序问题,探索了一条以形式正义约束和保障实质正义、矫正司法恣意的中国判例之路。

The Chinese Supreme People Court has established the researchingbasement in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, and constructed the instructiveintellectual cases rule （the rules in accordance with the precedent case）. The academiccircles have reached a consensus that the reformation has obtained achievement.The establishment of the rule is required to promoting two critical factor, one is toimprove outer social condition and resolve the inner problems deriving from judicialsystem, another is to complete construction of the judicial rule in accordance withthe precedent cases itself. The Beijing Intellectual Property Court resolves the innerconditional problems deriving for judicial authority, basing on the principal that thejudge is the key role in the process of the trial, by the way of inner reformation ofrunning of the trial power. The inner reformation founded the rule of keeping theconsistence in the whole process of the trial activities, including the process of cases’acceptance, hearing course and final legal decision, developing a new path to resolveprocedural problem in trial of the rule in accordance with the precedent cases.