期刊文献+

美国学前教育项目质量评价:内容、特点与启示 被引量:8

The U.S.A Preschool Program Quality Assessment: Content,Characteristics and Enlightenments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学前教育项目质量评价作为有世界影响力的美国高宽课程的质量评价工具,包含对幼儿园的班级评价和机构评价两个维度的评价内容,体现了引导教育质量提升的目的观、鼓励评价主体和利益相关者平等参与的主体观、强调过程质量改进的路径观、重视质性评价与量性评价相结合的方法观等特点。对我国学前教育质量评价的启示在于:开发以改进质量为目标的全国性评价工具;鼓励教师、家长等多主体参与的开放式评价;设计以过程性质量为主的综合性评价内容;运用观察和访谈相结合的多样化评价方法。 Program Quality Assessment (PQA),which was developed by US High-Scope Education Research Foundation, has two content items: Classroom Item and Agency Item. Its basic characteristics are: to set the option of improving the early childhood education quality; to encourage the equal participation of multiple stakeholders subjects; to stress the content view of improving process quality; to emphasize mixed methods of qualitative evaluation and quan- tity evaluation. PQA can give us some enlightenments: to develop scientific and appropriate assessment tools for im- proving quality; to encourage open and multi-dimensional assessment subjects enrolling; to design the integrated as- sessment contents stressing on process quality; to use mixed and multiple assessment methods,such as integrated ob- serving and interview.
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期20-24,共5页 Theory and Practice of Education
基金 2015年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目<幼儿园教师胜任力发展研究>(项目编号:SKZZA2015003)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 美国学前教育质量 项目质量评价 高宽课程 the U·S·A early childhood education quality program quality assessment High-scope Curriculum
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Dahlberg, G.,Moss.P.,& Pence, A.R.Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern Perspectives IMP. Psychology Press, 1999.45-53.
  • 2Vandell,D.,& Wolfe.B.Child Care Quality: Does it Matter and does it Need to be Improved? [J3. University of Wisconsin-Madi- son, Institute for Research on Poverty, 2000, (78): 79-84.
  • 3Halle, T, Viek, Whittaker.J.E., Anderson.R.Quality in Early C hild- hood Care and Education Settings:A Compendium of Measures [J3.Washington, DC: Child Trends.Prepared by Child Trends for the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Famihes, US Department of Health and Human Services,Accessed on Sept,2010, (4) :2012.
  • 4Epstein, A.S.Essentials of Active Learning in Preschool: Getting toKnow High/Scope Curriculum~ M 3.High / Scope Press, 2007.36 -98.
  • 5Tierney,R.D.Fairness as a Muhifaceted Quality in Classroom Assessment(J 3. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2014, (43) : 55 -69.
  • 6Shepard,L.,Kagan,S.L.,& Wurtz.E.Principles and Recommen- dations for Early Childhood Assessments [EB/OL3.http://files. eric.ed.gov/fulhext/ED416033.pdf.2016-1-10.
  • 7李克建,胡碧颖.国际视野中的托幼机构教育质量评价——兼论我国托幼机构教育质量评价观的重构[J].比较教育研究,2012,34(7):15-20. 被引量:59
  • 8中华人民共和国教育部.幼儿园教育指导纲要(试行)[EB/OL].http://www.edu.cn/20011126/3011708.shtml2012-06-24.
  • 9刘丽湘.当前我国幼儿园教育质量评价工作的误区及调整策略[J].学前教育研究,2006(7):85-87. 被引量:50
  • 10Pauline L Slot, Paul P.M. Leseman, Josje Verhagen, Hanna Mulder. Associations between Structural Quality Aspects and Process Quality in Dutch Early Childhood Education and Care Settings [J ]. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2015, (33): 64-76.

二级参考文献51

共引文献159

同被引文献106

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部