期刊文献+

角膜塑形术后眼前节形态及调节功能 被引量:14

Anterior segment biometry and accommodative function after orthokeratology
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究近视儿童在配戴角膜塑形镜前及3个月后,调节反应及调节过程中眼前节形态的变化。方法前瞻性实验研究。本实验共纳入18名进展性近视青少年[(14.4±2.6)岁]作为研究对象。在配戴角膜塑形镜前及持续夜戴3个月后(摘镜后2h内),在采用Badal光学系统矫正受检者屈光不正的基础上,使用开放视野型红外验光仪分别在0D、3D和5D的调节刺激下测量眼球屈光力,并计算调节反应量。同时使用实验室自行搭建的超长深度光学相干断层扫描仪(OCT)获取不同调节刺激下眼前节形态,每种刺激均重复拍摄2次。眼前节形态参数包括瞳孔直径(PD)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)以及晶状体前表面曲率半径(LAC)。分析戴镜前及戴镜3个月后调节反应及眼前节形态变化量的差异,数据采用配对t检验进行比较。结果在配戴角膜塑形镜3个月后,调节反应在3D[(1.72±0.59)Dvs(2.42±0.84)D]和5D[(3.09±0.63)Dvs.(3.61±0.86)D]刺激下均显著增加,差异有统计学意义(t=2.84、2.12,P〈0.05)。戴镜3个月后,2种调节刺激下调节刺激前后的AACD、ALAC、APD、△LT均较戴镜前变化更为显著。AACD[3D:(-0.11±0.04)mmvs.(-0.16±0.06)mm,t=3.88,P〈0.01;5D:(-0.15±0.05)mmvs.(-0.20±0.07)mm,t=2.37,P〈0.051、ALAC[3D:(-2.60±0.79)mm vs.(-3.81±1.08)mm,t=3.96,P〈0.01;5D:(-3.57±1.14)mmvs.(-4.32±1.36)mm,t=2.08,P〈0.05]、ALT[3D:(0.22±0.13)mmvs.(0.27±0.06)mm,t=-1.94,P〈0.05;5D:(0.26±0.09)mmvs.(0.30±0.10)mm,t=-1.99,P〈0.051在戴镜前后的差异均有统计学意义,而APD仅在3D[(-1.55~0.42)mmvs.(-1.71±0.37)mm]调节刺激下变化量具有统计学意义(t=1.76,P〈0.05)。结论配戴角膜塑形镜后,调节过程中调节反应及眼前节形态的变化幅度增大,调节滞后减少,调节功能得到改善。 Objective To investigate the changes in accommodative response and anterior segment biometry during accommodation in young progressive myopes who wear overnight orthokeratology lenses. Methods Eighteen children (age: 14.4±2.6 years) were enrolled in this prospective experimental study and were tested before wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses and after wearing them for three months. Using a Badal optical system, the refractive error of each subject was corrected before and after lens wear, and then accommodative stimuli of 3 D and 5 D were presented. A custom-built optical coherence tomographer (OCT) with a long scan depth was used to image the entire anterior segment through the pupil, and to obtain the anterior segment biometry including pupil diameter (PD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and the lens anterior surface's radius of curvature (LAC). An auto-refractometer (WAM-5500) was used to measure ocular refraction during accommodation, which was used to calculate the accommodative response. The measurements of anterior segment biometry and accommodative response were repeated twice under each accommodative state. Results After wearing orthokeratology lenses for one to three months, an improvement in the accommodative response was evident under both the 3 D (1.72±059 D vs. 2.42±0.84 D)and 5 D (3.09±0.63 D vs. 3.61±0.86 D) accommodative states (paired t-test, t=2.84, 2.12, P〈0.05). During at.commodation, APD, AAC[), ALT, and ALAC changed obviously. Compared with baseline (betbre wearing OK lenses), accommodation-related changes in AACD (3 D:-0.11±0.04 mm vs. -0.16-+0.06 ram, t=3.88, P〈O.01, 5 D: -0.15±0.05 ,urn vs. -0.20±0.07 mm, t=2.37, P〈0.05), ALAC (3 D:-2.60±0.79 mm vs. -3.81±1.08 mm, t=3.96, P〈0.01; 5 D: -3.57±1.14 mm vs. -4.32±1.36 mm, t=2.08, P〈0.05) and ALT (3 D: 0.22±0.13 mm vs. 0.27±0.06 mm, t=-1.94, P〈0.05; 5 D: 0.26±0.09 mm vs. 0.30±0.10 mm, t=-1.99, P〈0.05) showed statistically significant increases. Conclusion After wearing orthokeratology lenses for 3 months, the accommodative response and changes in the anterior segment biometry increase in myopic children.
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2016年第4期232-236,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(81170869) 温州市科技计划项目(Y20140148)
关键词 角膜塑形术 近视 调节 眼前节 Orthokeratology Myopia Accommodation,ocular Anterior segment biometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Swarbrick HA. Orthokeratology review and update[J]. Clin Exp Optom,2006,89(3):124-143.
  • 2Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control[J]. Curr Eye Res,2005,30(1):71-80.
  • 3Cheung SW, Cho P. Validity of axial length measurements for monitoring myopic progression in orthokeratology[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2013,54(3):1613-1615.
  • 4Kang P, Swarbrick H. Time course of the effects of orthokeratology on peripheral refraction and corneal topography[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2013,33(3):277-282.
  • 5Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, et al. Influence of ocular wavefront aberrations on axial length elongation in myopic children treated with overnight orthokeratology[J]. Ophthalmology,2015,122(1):93-100.
  • 6Weizhong L, Zhikuan Y, Wen L, et al. A longitudinal study on the relationship between myopia development and near accommodation lag in myopic children[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2008,28(1):57-61.
  • 7Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Held R. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and at the onset of myopia in children[J]. Optom Vis Sci,2005,82(4):273-278.
  • 8吴从霞,毛欣杰,林惠玲,瞿佳.角膜塑形镜对近视眼调节微波动幅度和调节滞后的影响[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2013,15(2):75-78. 被引量:13
  • 9朱梦钧,冯浩雁,朱剑锋,瞿小妹.调节幅度对角膜塑形术近视控制作用的影响[J].中华眼科杂志,2014,50(1):14-19. 被引量:40
  • 10Reim TR, Lund M, Wu R. Orthokeratology and adolescent myopia control[J]. Contact Lens Spectrum,2003,18(3):40-42.

二级参考文献50

  • 1Norton TI', Siegwar JT Jr, Amedo AO. Effectiveness of hyperopic defocus, minimal defocus, or myopic defocus in competition with a myopiagenic stimulus in tree shrew eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2006,47:4687-4699.
  • 2Collins M, Davis B, Wood J, Microfluctuations of steady-state accommodation and the cardiopulmonary system. Vision Res, 1995,35 : 2491-2502.
  • 3Langaas T, Riddell PM, Svarverud E, et al. Variability of the accommodation response in early onset myopia. Optom Vis Sei, 2008,85 : 37-48.
  • 4Wallman J, Winawer J. Homeostasis of eye growth and question of myopia. Neuron ,2004,43:447-468.
  • 5Kakita T, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in children myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei, 2011,52:2170-2174.
  • 6Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in Orthokeratology(ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei,2012,53:7077-7085.
  • 7Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamota F, et al. Long-term effect of overnight orthokeratology on axial length elongation in ehildrenhood myopia: a 5-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ,2012:53:3913-3919.
  • 8Day M, Strang NC, Seidel D, et al. Refractive groups differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Ophthalmic Physiol 0pt,2006,26 : 88- 96.
  • 9Chauhan K, Charman WN. Single figure indices for the steady-state accommodative response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1995,15:217-221.
  • 10Langaas T, Riddell PM. Accommodative instability: relationship to progression of early onset myopia. Clin Exp Optom,2012, 95 : 153-159.

共引文献65

同被引文献113

引证文献14

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部