摘要
目的:通过对早期脓毒性休克患者应用目标导向性治疗(EGDT)方案和常规治疗对比,观察患者90d内的治疗结局,探讨EGDT方案治疗的意义。方法:收集以我院为主的多家医院早期脓毒性休克患者1 001例患者,随机分为2组,其中EGDT组512例、常规治疗组489例。根据90d内全因病死率观察临床结局。结果:EGDT组死亡165例(32.2%),常规治疗组死亡163例(33.3%),相对危险度为0.97,P=0.9;EGDT组的绝对危险度降低了-1.1个百分点。包括健康相关的生活质量,发生严重不良反应的比例(EGDT组4%,常规治疗组6.3%,P=0.58),EGDT组与常规治疗组差异无统计学意义。结论:早期的脓毒性休克患者在严格的EGDT指导下进行静脉应用抗菌药物,液体复苏,血流动力学监测管理不能改善预后。
Objective:Comparing early goal-directed therapy(EGDT)and usual care for patients presenting with early sepsis shock.To investing the value of EGDT in the treatment of early sepsis shock.Method:We conducted a pragmatic randomized trial in our hospitals.Patients were randomized to receive EGDT(a 6 hours protocol)or usual care.A total of 1 001 patients were recruited in the study,with 512 assigned to EGDT group and 489 to usual care group.The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days.Result:By 90 days,165 of 512 patients(32.2%)in EGDT group and 163 of 489patients(33.3%)in usual care group had died(relative risk in EGDT was 0.97,P=0.9),the absolute risk reduction of EGDT group had lower 1.1percentage points.Secondary outcome including health-relative quality of life,or rates of adverse events showed no significant differences between EGDT group and usual care group.Conclusion:Patients with early sepsis shock who increased use of administration antibiotics,intravenous fluid,hemodynamic management that conducted strictly by EGDT could not get improved outcome.
出处
《临床急诊杂志》
CAS
2016年第4期265-268,273,共5页
Journal of Clinical Emergency