期刊文献+

nfertility, impotence, and emasculation - psychosocia :ontexts for abandoning reproduction

nfertility, impotence, and emasculation - psychosocia :ontexts for abandoning reproduction
原文传递
导出
摘要 From a Darwinian perspective we live to reproduce, but in various situations genetic males elect not to reproduce by choosing medical treatments leading to infertility, impotence, and, in the extreme, emasculation. For many men, infertility can be psychologically distressing. However, for certain genetic males, being infertile may improve their quality of life. Examples include (1) men who seek vasectomy, (2) individuals with Gender Dysphoria (e.g., transwomen, and modern day voluntary eunuchs), (3) most gay men, and (4) men treated for testicular and prostate cancer. Men who desire vasectomy typically have a Darwinian fitness W 〉1 at the time of their vasectomies; i.e., after they have their desired number of offspring or consider themselves past an age for parenting newborns. In contrast, prostate and testicular cancer patients, along with individuals with extreme Gender Dysphoria, do not necessarily seek to be sterile, but accept it as an unavoidable consequence of the treatment for their condition undertaken for survival (in case of cancer patients) or to achieve a better quality of life (for those with Gender Dysphoria). Most gay men do not father children, but they may play an avuncular role, providing for their siblings' offspring's welfare, thus improving their inclusive fitness through kin selection. In a strictly Darwinian model, the primary motivation for all individuals is to reproduce, but there are many situations for men to remove themselves from the breeding populations because they have achieved a fitness W 〉1, or have stronger medical or psychological needs that preclude remaining fertile. From a Darwinian perspective we live to reproduce, but in various situations genetic males elect not to reproduce by choosing medical treatments leading to infertility, impotence, and, in the extreme, emasculation. For many men, infertility can be psychologically distressing. However, for certain genetic males, being infertile may improve their quality of life. Examples include (1) men who seek vasectomy, (2) individuals with Gender Dysphoria (e.g., transwomen, and modern day voluntary eunuchs), (3) most gay men, and (4) men treated for testicular and prostate cancer. Men who desire vasectomy typically have a Darwinian fitness W 〉1 at the time of their vasectomies; i.e., after they have their desired number of offspring or consider themselves past an age for parenting newborns. In contrast, prostate and testicular cancer patients, along with individuals with extreme Gender Dysphoria, do not necessarily seek to be sterile, but accept it as an unavoidable consequence of the treatment for their condition undertaken for survival (in case of cancer patients) or to achieve a better quality of life (for those with Gender Dysphoria). Most gay men do not father children, but they may play an avuncular role, providing for their siblings' offspring's welfare, thus improving their inclusive fitness through kin selection. In a strictly Darwinian model, the primary motivation for all individuals is to reproduce, but there are many situations for men to remove themselves from the breeding populations because they have achieved a fitness W 〉1, or have stronger medical or psychological needs that preclude remaining fertile.
出处 《Asian Journal of Andrology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第3期403-408,I0008,共7页 亚洲男性学杂志(英文版)
关键词 EMASCULATION IMPOTENCE INFERTILITY psychological distress emasculation impotence infertility psychological distress
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Chandra A, Stephen EH. rmpaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995. Faro Plann Perspect 1998; 30: 34-42.
  • 2Stephen EH, Chandra A. Declining estimates of infertility in the United States: 1982-2002. Fertil Steri12006; 86: 516-23.
  • 3Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, Family Planning, and Reproductive Health of U.S. Women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 23, Data from the National Survey of Family Growth: Vital Health Statistics; 2005. p. 1-160.
  • 4Wellons MF, Fujimoto VY, Baker VL, Barrington DS, Broomfield D, etal. Race matters: a systematic review of racialethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes. Fertil Steri12012; 98: 406-9.
  • 5Smith JF, Eisenberg ML, Glidden D, Millstein SG, Cedars M, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States. Fertil Steri12011; 96: 95-101.
  • 6Jain T. Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertil Steri12006; 85: 876-81.
  • 7Simmons FA. Human infertility. N Engl J Med 1956; 255:1186-92.
  • 8Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod 1991; 6:811-6.
  • 9Anderson JE, Farr SL, Jamieson D J, Warner L, Macaluso M. Infertility services reported by men in the United States: National Survey data. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 2466-70.
  • 10Eisenberg ML, Lathi RB, Baker VL, Westphal LM, Milki AA, et al. Frequency of the male infertility evaluation., data from the National Survey of Family Growth. J Urol 2013: 189: 1030-4.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部