期刊文献+

宿州市2014年343例手足口病病原学监测结果分析 被引量:2

Analysis of etiology monitoring of 343 cases with hand- foot- mouth disease in Suzhou city,2014
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解宿州市2014年手足口病主要流行型别和分布特征,为制订手足口病防控方案及临床治疗提供实验室依据。方法采用Real-time RT-PCR方法检测肠道病毒71型(EV71)、柯萨奇病毒A组16型(Cox A16)的特异性核酸。结果 343份手足口病临床诊断病例标本,肠道病毒核酸总阳性185份,阳性率59.2%。其中EV71阳性45份,阳性率13.1%;Cox A16阳性98份,阳性率28.6%;其他肠道病毒42份,阳性率12.2%。男女比为1.8:1,男女阳性率分别为54.6%(118/216)和52.8%(67/127)。结论 2014年宿州市手足口病主要流行型别为Cox A16,同时伴有EV71和其它肠道病毒;男女阳性检出率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.113,P>0.05)。各县区阳性检出率差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.417,P<0.05)。 Objective To study the pathogens and distribution characteristics of hand- foot- mouth disease( HFMD)in Suzhou city in 2014,and provide scientific evidence for making effective measures. Methods The Real- time RT-PCR method was applied for Enterovirus 71 and Coxasckievirus A16 Nucleic acid detection. Results 185 cases of the 343 clinically diagnosed cases were positive. Positive rate was 59. 2%. Of them,there were 45 cases infected with Enterovirus71 and 98 cases infected with Coxasckievirus A16,with positive rate of 13. 1% and 28. 6%,respectively. The sex ratio was1. 8: 1,and the positive rate of male and female was 54. 6% and 52. 8%,respectively. Conclusion Cox A16 was the major pathogens causing HFMD in Suzhou in 2014,accompanied by EV71 and other intestinal virus. There was no significant difference( χ2= 0. 113,P 0. 05) in detection rate between male and female,however,the difference was significantly( χ2=16. 417,P 0. 05) among counties.
作者 张玲 葛明明
出处 《安徽预防医学杂志》 2016年第1期4-6,共3页 Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 手足口病 肠道病毒 病原检测 Hand-foot and mouth disease Enterovirus Etiology monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献50

  • 1李琳琳,何雅晴,朱俊萍,薛颖,朱雅芳,徐星晔,金奇.柯萨奇病毒A组16型中国分离株(Cox.A16 SHZH00-1)全基因组序列测定及分析[J].病毒学报,2005,21(3):217-222. 被引量:61
  • 2谭洁,何雅青,杨洪.深圳市2004年手足口病暴发疫情处理及病原学检测[J].实用预防医学,2005,12(6):1345-1346. 被引量:43
  • 3陈德颖,林向利,杨正辉.利用国家疾病监测信息管理系统开展手足口病监测报告[J].疾病监测,2006,21(8):435-436. 被引量:204
  • 4赵晓光,郭金鹏,谌志强,李君文,李援,赵虹,郑洪,郭军巧.肠道病毒检测及其抗病毒药物研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2007,23(3):375-377. 被引量:20
  • 5卫生部.手足口病诊疗指南(2010年版)[S].卫发明电[2010]38号,2010.
  • 6Li L, He Y, Yang H, et al. Genetic characteristics of human enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 circulating from 1999 to 2004 in Shenzhen, People's Republic of China[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2005,43(8):3835-3839.
  • 7Chang LY, Lin TY, Hsu KH, et al. Clinical features and risk factors of pulmonary oedema after enterovirus-71-related hand, foot, and mouth disease[J]. Lancet, 1999,354(9191): 1682-1686.
  • 8Zhang Y, Tan X J, Wang H, et al. An outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with subgenotype C4 of human enterovirus 71 in Shandong, China[J]. J Clin Virol,2009,44(4):262-267.
  • 9Zhang Y, Wang D, Yan D, et al. Molecular evidence of persistent epidemic and evolution of subgenotype B1 Coxsackievirus AI6- associated hand, foot, and mouth disease in China[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2010,48(2):619-622.
  • 10Chang LY, Lin TY, Huang YC, et al. Comparison of enterovirus 71 and Coxsackie-virus A16 clinical illnesses during the Taiwan enterovirus epidemic, 1998[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J,1999,18(12): 1092-1096.

共引文献16

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部