期刊文献+

吗啡与氢吗啡酮在小儿静脉自控镇痛中的应用效果比较 被引量:7

Comparison of the Effect of Morphine and Hydromorphone in the Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia of Pedia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较吗啡与氢吗啡酮在小儿静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)应用中的镇痛效果及副作用。方法:选取40名6~10岁择期行下肢骨科手术的患儿,术毕即予PCIA,随机分为两组:M组(吗啡背景剂量15μg/kg/h,PCA剂量15μg/kg)和H组(氢吗啡酮背景剂量3μg/kg/h,PCA剂量3μg/kg),每组20例。记录患儿PCIA后3、6、12、24和48h的FLACC疼痛评分、Ramsay镇静评分、PCA次数及不良反应的发生情况(恶心呕吐、皮肤瘙痒、尿潴留、过度镇静、呼吸抑制)。结果:两组患儿各时间点FLACC疼痛评分、Ramsay镇静评分比较均无统计学差异(P均〉0.05)。术后第二天,M组PCA次数少于H组,差异存在统计学意义(P〈0.05)。M组皮肤瘙痒发生率(15%)显著高于H组(0%)(P〈0.05),两组其余不良反应的发生情况比较均无统计学差异(P均〉0.05)。结论:氢吗啡酮与吗啡用于小儿术后PCIA的镇痛效果和安全性相当。 Objective: To compare the analgesic effect and side-effect of morphine and hydromorphone in pediatric patient con- trolled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Methods: Forty children, aged from 6 to 10 years, undergoing elective lower limb or hip operations were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive postoperative PCIA. Group M (morphine 15 μg/kg/h basal infusion and PCA doses of 15 μg/k), H (hydromorphone 3μg/kg/h basal infusion and PCA doses of 3 μg/kg). The FLACC score, Ramsay sedation score, number of PCA boluses, and adverse reaction (such as nausea/vomiting, pruritus, retention of urine, over sedation and respiratory depression) were recorded at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48h after PICA. Results: The comfort b scores, ramsay sedation score were similar between 2 groups (P〉0.05). There were significantly fewer demands of PCA boluses of the group M compared with group H(P〈0.05) on Day 2 after treatment. Pruri- tus as a side-effect was more severe in group M (P〈0.05). There was no difference in the incidence rates of other opioid-related side effects between 2 groups. Conclusion: Both morphine and hydromorphone could provide appropriate analgesia and less side effects in pediatric PCIA.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2016年第13期2469-2471,共3页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 上海浦东新区科技发展基金创新资金项目(PKJ2013-Y61)
关键词 吗啡 氢吗啡酮 静脉自控镇痛 小儿 Morphine Hydromorphone Patient controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) Pediatric
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Quigley c. A systematic review of hydromorphone in acute and chronic pain[J]. J Pain Symptom Manageme, 2003, 25(2): 169-178.
  • 2Lundeberg S, Lonqvist PA. Update on systemic postoperative analge- sia in chiidren[J].Paediatr Anaesth, 2004, 14(5): 394-397.
  • 3Murray A, Hagen NA. Hydromorphone [J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2005,29(5 Suppl): S57-66.
  • 4Hong D, Flood P, Diaz G. The Side Effects of Morphine and Hydro- morphone Patient-Controlled Analgesia [J]. Anesth Analg, 2008, 107 (4): 1384-1389.
  • 5Sechzer PH. Objective measurement of pain[J]. Anesthesiology, 1968, 29(1): 209-210.
  • 6Grass JA. Patient-controlled analgesia [J]. Anesth Analg, 2005, 101 (5S): $44-$61.
  • 7Lonnqvist PA, Morton NS. Postoperative analgesia in infants and chil- dren[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2005, 95(1): 59-68.
  • 8Wolf AR, Jackman L. Analgesia and sedation after pediatric cardiac surgery[J]. Pediatr Anesth, 2011, 21(5): 567-567.
  • 9DiGiusto M, Bhalla T, Martin D, et al. Patient-controlled analgesia in the pediatric population: morphine versus hydromorphone [J]. J Pain Res, 2014, 13(7): 471-475.
  • 10Felden L, Walter C, Harder S, et al. Comparative clinical effects of hydromorphone and morphine: a meta-analysis [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011,107(3): 319-328.

同被引文献51

引证文献7

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部