期刊文献+

无害性胰腺炎评分对高脂血症性胰腺炎的评估 被引量:3

HAP scoring system for evaluation of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价无害性胰腺炎评分(harmless acute pancreatitis score,HAPS)评估高脂血症性胰腺炎的价值。方法 回顾性分析2010年3月至2014年3月同济大学附属第十人民医院收治的60名高脂血症性胰腺炎(HLAP)患者资料,以2012亚特兰大分级标准定义急性胰腺炎严重程度,计算HAPS评分、绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)并计算曲线下面积(AUC)以分析HAPS对HLAP严重度的评估价值。结果 60例HLAP患者中,39例(65%)患者诊断为无害性胰腺炎,21例(35%)患者诊断为非无害性胰腺炎;HAPS评分预测非重症急性胰腺炎的特异性为75%(95%CI:50.9~91.3%),阳性预测值87.2%(95%CI:72.6~95.7%),AUC为0.8(95%CI:0.677~0.892);HAP评分异常患者发生不良结局的风险增高。结论 HAPS能简单准确预测轻症高脂血症性胰腺炎。 Objective To assess the application of harmless acute pancreatitis score (HAPS) in evaluation of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis (HLAP). Methods A total of 60 patients with HLAP were enrolled between March 2010 and March 2014. The 2012 revision of Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis was applied to classified acute pancreatitis as mild acute pancreatitis, moderately severe acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). HAPS scores were used to evaluate the HLAP patients, and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) was used to predict the severity of the disease. Results Among all patients, 39 (65%) were diagnosed as harmless acute pancreatitis and 21 (35%) were as non-harmless clinical course. HAPS score predicted the non-severe course of HLAP with a specificity of 75% (95% C150.9%-91.3% ), positive predictive value of 87.2% (95% CI 72.6%- 95.7% ) and AUC of HAPS in predicting non- severe HLAP was 0. 8 ( 95% CI 0. 677 - 0. 892, P 〈 0. 05 ). Patients with non-harmless acutepancreatitis had a higher risk of poorer prognosis compared to those with harmless acute pancreatitis. Conclusion Harmless acute pancreatitis score is simple and effective for predicting the non-severe course of hypedipidemic acute pancreatitis.
出处 《同济大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2016年第2期52-56,共5页 Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金(81200320 81570578) 上海市第十人民医院优秀青年人才培养计划(12XSGG105)
关键词 急性胰腺炎 高脂血症 HAPS 评分系统 acute pancreatitis hypertriglyceridemia HAPS scoring algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1操龙洋,吴琼,张俊杰,孙龙娥,王志荣.急性胰腺炎320例临床分析[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2011,32(4):70-72. 被引量:6
  • 2Tsuang W, Navaneethan U, Ruiz L, et al. Hypertrigl- yceridemic pancreatitis: presentation and management [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2009,104(4) : 984-991.
  • 3Navarro S, Cubiella J, Feu F, et al. Hypertrigl- yceridemic acute pancreatitis. Is its clinical course different from lithiasic acute pancreatitis? [ J ]. Med Clin(Barc), 2004,123(15) : 567-570.
  • 4Huang YX, Jia L, Jiang SM, et al. Incidence and clinical features of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis from Guangdong, China: a retrospective multicenter study[J]. Pancreas, 2014,43(4):548-552.
  • 5Khan AA, Parekh D, Cho Y, et al. Improved prediction of outcome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis by the APACHE I1 score at 48 hours after hospital admission compared with the APACHE II score at admission. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [ J]. Arch Surg, 2002, 137 (10) : 1136 - 1140.
  • 6Surco Y, Huerta Mercado J, Pinto J, et al. Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis [ J ]. Rev Gastroenterol Peru, 2012,32( 3 ) : 241 - 250.
  • 7Cho YS, Kim HK, Jang EC, et al. Usefulness of the Bedside Index for severity in acute pancreatitis in the early prediction of severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis [ J ]. Pancreas, 2013,42 (3) : 483 - 487.
  • 8Triantopoulou C, Lytras D, Maniatis P, et al. Computed tomography versus Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis: a prospective, compa- rative study with statistical evaluation [ J ]. Pancreas, 2007,35(3) : 238 -242.
  • 9Lankisch PG, Weber-Dany B, Hebel K, et al. The harmless acute pancreatitis score: a clinical algorithm for rapid initial stratification of nonsevere disease [ J ]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009,7 (6) : 702 - 705.
  • 10Oskarsson V, Mehrabi M, Orsini N, et al. Validation of the harmless acute pancreatitis score in predicting nonsevere course of acute pancreatitis [ J ]. Pancreato- logy,2011,11 (5) : 464 -468.

二级参考文献15

共引文献114

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部