期刊文献+

论思想政治教育与“规训”的根本区别 被引量:3

On the Differences between Ideological and Political Education and Discipline
下载PDF
导出
摘要 福柯的规训权力理论揭示了教育管理制度的心灵操控功能,展现了思想政治教育同规训的相关性。但由于未能认清规训权力的性质,使得人们误把思想政治教育认作规训。规训本质上是压迫性的权力,它起源于资本主义社会的生产环节,并将随着对资本主义的扬弃而被超越。思想政治教育不是规训,它作为针对思想观念的政治实践活动,只有在马克思资本批判的视野中才能超越规训,找到自己的支点。 Foucault's theory about discipline indicates that rules and regulations in education management may lead to soul manipulation, which shows the correlation between ideological and political education and discipline.However,people regard ideological and political education as discipline because of the misunderstanding of the nature of discipline. The essence of discipline is oppressive power.It is originated from the production link of capitalism and may be surmounted with the sublation of capitalism.Ideological and political education is not discipline and as the political practice of ideology, it can only transcend discipline and find its foundation from the perspective of Marx's critique of capitalism.
作者 常宴会
出处 《河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第2期37-40,75,共5页 Journal of Hohai University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基金 中国人民大学2015年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划
关键词 思想政治教育 规训 马克思 福柯 ideological and political education discipline Marx Foucault
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献25

共引文献501

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部