期刊文献+

我国国有控股上市公司并购模式与并购效率研究 被引量:3

A Research into the M&A Models and Efficiency of China's State-Owned Enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2007~2014年我国资本市场国有控股企业所有并购案例为样本,采用数据包络分析技术(DEA),着重研究了我国国有控股上市公司并购模式对并购效率的影响。研究结果发现,国有控股上市公司多元化并购的并购效率优于专业化并购,非关联并购的并购效率优于关联并购,跨区域并购的并购效率优于同区域并购。因此,我国国有控股上市公司需要大胆开展多元化并购,积极推进非关联并购和跨区域并购,政府部门则需要为国有控股上市公司开展多元化并购扫除障碍,加强资本市场关联性并购监管,放弃干预跨区域并购的狭义"地方主义"思维。 Choosing the MA cases of the A-share listed companies in China during 2007 and 2014 as samples,I use DEA method to measure the influences of MA models on its efficiency,' and get the following findings.Firstly,the SOEs' efficiency of diversified acquisition is superior to that of professional acquisition;secondly,the SOEs' efficiency of non-affiliated acquisition is better than that of affiliated acquisition;thirdly,the SOEs' efficiency of cross-regional acquisition is better than that of the same region.China's SOEs need to boldly carry out diversified MA and actively promote the non-affiliated MA and crossregional MA.In order to promote the benign development of China's MA market,government departments should remove obstacles to SOEs' diversified MA,strengthen the supervision of relevance merger in the capital market,and give up "localism" thinking and the intervention in regional MA.
作者 石颖
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期43-48,共6页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"东北老工业基地国有企业混合所有制改革中的公司治理问题研究"(批准号:15BGL077)的阶段性成果
关键词 国有控股上市公司 并购模式 并购效率 state-owned enterprises M&A models M&A efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Brito, D., Pereira, P. and Ramalho, J.J.S., Mergers, Coordinated Effects and Efficiency in the Portuguese Non-life Insurance Industry. International Journal of Industrial Or- ganization, Vol. 31 (5), 2013, pp. 554--568.
  • 2Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W. H. , Theory of the Firm.. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Struc- ture. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 (4), 1976, pp. 305--360.
  • 3Khanna, T. and Palepu, K., Emerging Market Business Groups, Foreign Intermediaries, and Corporate Govern- ance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, pp. 265 --294.
  • 4Dauber, D. , Opposing Positions in M~A Research: Cul ture, Integration and Performance. Cross Cultural Manage- ment*. An International Journal, Vol. 19 (3), 2012, pp. 375--398.
  • 5Mason, R. and Weeds, H., Merger Policy, Entry, and Entrepreneurship. European Economic Review, Vol. 57, 2013~ pp. 23--38.
  • 6Feroz, E.H. , Kim, .% and Raab, R. , Performance Measurement in Corporate Governance: Do Mergers Im- prove Managerial Performance in the Post-merger Period? Review of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 4 ( 3 ), 2005, pp. 86-- 100.
  • 7陈旭东,曾春华,杨兴全.终极控制人两权分离、多元化并购与公司并购绩效[J].经济管理,2013,39(12):23-31. 被引量:15
  • 8Cording, M., Christmann, P. and Weigelt, C., Measur- ing Theoretically Complex Constructs: The Case of Acquisi- tion Performance. Strategic Organization, Vol. 8 ( 1 ), 2010, pp. 11--41.
  • 9张雯,张胜,李百兴.政治关联、企业并购特征与并购绩效[J].南开管理评论,2013,16(2):64-74. 被引量:115

二级参考文献55

共引文献128

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部