期刊文献+

基线BMI水平与MCI患者认知转归的相关性探讨 被引量:1

The correlation between the baseline BMI levels and cognitive outcomes in MCI patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨基线BMI水平与MCI患者认知转归的相关性。方法入组2011年10月-2012年10月在上海市浦东新区周浦医院及同济大学附属东方医院神经内科门诊就诊的75例MCI患者,随访时间为(1.70±1.25)y。随访内容:蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MOCA)、简易智能精神状态检查量表(MMSE)、画钟试验(CDT)检查、基线资料以及相关临床资料。数据分析使用SPSS 19.0统计学软件包,P<0.05有统计学意义。随访结果 MOCA总分较基线增加2分或以上为认知功能好转(好转组);减少2分或以上为认知功能恶化(恶化组);增减少于2分为认知功能稳定(稳定组)。结果 MCI随访者中好转组30例,稳定组30例,恶化组15例。恶化组基线BMI<24 kg/m2者10例(66.67%),好转稳定组22例(36.67%),两组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05);影响因素分析基线BMI<24 kg/m2(%)的P值<0.05,有统计学意义。结论基线BMI<24 kg/m2与MCI患者认知恶化存在相关性,可以进一步扩大随访人数、延长随访时间,进而深入研究。 Objective To explore the correlation between the baseline BMI levels and cognitive outcomes in MCI patients. Methods 75 MCI outpatients in Shanghai Zhoupu Hospital in October 2011 to October 2012 were selected. Follow-up time is was 1. 70 ± 1. 25 years. The follow-up project included MOCA test,MMSE test,CDT test,baseline data and clinical data. Data analysis used SPSS 19. 0 statistical software package. P〈0. 05 was statistically significant. According to follow-up result,MOCA score dropped two points is was defined as cognitive deterioration. MOCA score increased two points is was defined as cognitive improvement. MOCA score changed within two points is was defined as stable group. Results There were 10 cases whose BMI 24 kg / m^2 in Worsen group( 66. 67%),and there were 21 cases whose BMI 24 kg / m^2 in stable group( 36. 67%). There were significant differences between the two groups( P〈0. 05). Influencing factors were analyzed. The the factor of baseline BMI 24 kg / m^2 was statistically significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusion There is a correlation between baseline BMI level and cognitive deterioration. We will expand the sample and extend the follow-up time to further clarify the correlation between the two in the future.
出处 《中风与神经疾病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第4期349-352,共4页 Journal of Apoplexy and Nervous Diseases
基金 浦东新区卫计委面上项目(PW-2015A-27)
关键词 MCI 基线BMI 认知转归 MCI Baseline BMI Cognitive outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Petersen RC,Doody R,Kurz A,et al.Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment[J].Arch Neurol,2001,58(12):1985-1992.
  • 2于宝成,田京利,欧阳荔莎,王玉敏,王成章,崔欣,王雪丽,齐丽娟,潘志刚,魏士贤,高义.老年人轻度认知损害的发病率及向痴呆或阿尔茨海默病的转化率:基于人群的队列研究(英文)[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(6):147-150. 被引量:8
  • 3Ward A,Tardiff S,Dye C,et al.Rate of conversion from prodromal Alzheimer’s disease to Alzheimer’s dementia:a systematic review of the literature[J].Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra,2013,3(1):320-332.
  • 4Mitchell AJ,Shiri-Feshki M.Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia-meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies[J].Acta Psychiatr Scand,2009,119(4):252-265.
  • 5Gao S,Unverzagt FW,Hall KS,et al.Mild cognitive impairment,incidence,progression,and reversion:findings from a community-based cohort of elderly African Americans[J].Am J Geriatr Psychiatry,2013,81(5):141-145.
  • 6Roberts RO,Knopman DS,Mielke MM,et al.Higher risk of progression to dementia in mild cognitive impairment cases who revert to normal[J].Neurology,2014,82(4):317-325.
  • 7Rabin LA,Pare N,Saykin AJ,et al.Differential memory test sensitivity for diagnosing amnestic mild cognitive impairment and predicting conversion to Alzheimer’s disease[J].Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn,2009,16(3):357-376.
  • 8Ahmed S,Haigh AM,de Jager CA,et al.Connected speech as a marker of disease progression in autopsy-proven Alzheimer’s disease[J].Brain,2013,136(12):3727-3737.
  • 9Smith T,Gildeh N,Holmes C.The montreal cognitive assessment:validity and utility in a memory clinic setting[J].Can J Psychiat,2007,52(5):329-332.
  • 10Laurin D,David CJ,Masaki KH,et al.Midlife C-reactive protein and risk of cognitive decline:a 31-year follow-up[J].Neurobiol Aging,2009,30(11):1724-1727.

二级参考文献1

共引文献7

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部