期刊文献+

尊严的概念及在生命伦理中的应用 被引量:4

The Conception of Dignity and Bioethics
原文传递
导出
摘要 尊严的概念在生命伦理学中得到了广泛的应用,但其对生命伦理的意义和价值体现在什么地方还存在着分歧。学者迈凯琳等认为尊严是一个无用的概念,应该从生命伦理学中驱除出去,而学者卡斯等则认为尊严是分析安乐死、临终关怀等生命伦理问题时不可缺少的概念。为了说明这些问题,就需要在尊严的历史维度中,从涉及到尊严的文献、规章中去找寻尊严的规定性,只有这样才能在生命伦理中得以充分地证明其存在的维度。 Over the past few decades,the concept of dignity has been widely applied to bioethics. However,there are significant differences in the concept of dignity. As the representative of some of the radical scholar Macklin believes that dignity is a useless concept,should be get rid of the bioethics; while scholar Kass holds that dignity is indispensable to analyze the ethical issues of euthanasia and other life concept. To illustrate these problems,we need to return to the dignity of the historical dimension,related to the dignity of literature,regulations,case to find dignity. The only way to be fully developed in Bioethics.
作者 刘刚
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期67-71,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金重大项目(14ZDB171)阶段性研究成果
关键词 尊严 生命伦理 自主性 Dignity Bioethics Autonomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1WMA. Declaration of Geneva. Geneva:WMA General Assembly [ R/ OL]. 1948 [2016 -02 -21 ]. http://www, wma. net/en/ 30 publications/10policies/g1/.
  • 2WHO. A Declaration on the Promotion of Patients' Rights in Europe [R/OL]. 200512016 - 02 - 21 J. http://www, who. int/genomies/ puhlic/eu_declaration1994, pdf.
  • 3H. Chochinov, T. Hack, T. Hassard, L. J Kristjanson, S. McClement,M. Hados. Dignity in the Terminally Ill: a Cross sectional, Cohort Study [ J ]. The Lancet,2002:360.
  • 4UNESCO. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights[ R/ OL]. 2005 [ 2016 - 02 - 21 ]. http ://portal. unesco, org,/en/ev, php -URL_ID = 31058&URL_DO = DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION = 201. html.
  • 5Tri - Council Policy Statement : Ethical Conduct for Research Invol- ving Humans[ R/OL]. 1998 [ 2016 - 02 - 21 ]. http ://publications. gc. ca/site/eng/78919/publication, html.
  • 6H. Kuhse. Is there a Tension between Autonomy and Dignity [ C ]// P. Kemp et al. ( Eds. ), In Bioethics and biolaw, Copenhagen : Rho- dos International Science and Art Publishers and Centre for Ethics and Law :2000,vol. II.
  • 7R. Macklin. Dignity is a Useless Concept[ J ]. BMJ,2003:327.
  • 8L. Kass. Life,Liberty and the Defense of Dignity[ M ]. San Francisco, CA : Encounter Books,2002.
  • 9R. Ashcroft. Making Sense of Dignity[J]. J Med Ethics,2005:31.
  • 10L. Nordenfelt. The Varieties of Dignity[ J]. Health Care Anal ,2004 ; 12(2).

同被引文献60

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部