朝鲜大院君被囚保定与中朝宗藩关系的变化

Dae Won Goon Jailed in Baoding and the Sino-Korean Suzerain-Vassal State Relationship

朝鲜一直被清朝视为重要的"外藩"。近代以前,中朝之间的宗藩关系比较松散,清廷对朝鲜国内的事务干预较少。随着西方列强及日本势力进入东亚和西太平洋地区,中朝之间的传统宗藩关系面临严峻挑战。1882年朝鲜发生"壬午兵变",清廷派兵镇压并以煽动兵变为由将朝鲜大院君羁禁于中国保定。此后,围绕大院君释回问题,中朝双方以及朝鲜内部各派系之间多有争论。最终,清廷为防止日俄势力对朝鲜的控制,于1885年释放大院君回朝,力图强化中朝宗藩关系。清廷对待大院君的政策从一个侧面反映了中朝之间宗藩关系的变化情况。

Korea had been regarded as an important ＂vassal state of the Qing dynasty＂. Before the modern times, the Sino-Korean Suzerain-Vassal State Relationship was loose, the Qing government per- formed less intervention into the Korean domestic affairs. With Western powers and the Japanese forcing in East Asia and the Western Pacific, Sino-Korean traditional suzerain vassal relations faced severe challen- ges. Korean ＂Im-ou mutiny＂ occurred in 1882, the Qing government sent troops to suppress and to mutiny Dae Won Goon custodial ban in Baoding, China, in the grounds of incitement. Since then, there were dis- putes between China and Korea on the issue of Dae Won Goon release. Eventually, the Qing court released Dae Won Goon back in 1885 to prevent the Russo Japanese forces~ control of Korea, trying to strengthen the Sino-Korean suzerain-vassal state relationship. The treatment policies of Dae Won Goon reflect the Si- no-Korean suzerain-vassal state relationship.