期刊文献+

工作压力对员工建言的影响机制:建言认知的视角 被引量:4

Research on the Mechanism of How Work Stress Impacts on Voice Behavior:From the Perspective of Voice Cognitive
原文传递
导出
摘要 信息时代下越来越多的企业重视员工意见,鼓励员工发言。但是建言具有挑战性和人际风险性,尤其当员工面临一定工作压力时,员工建言需要更多的认知过程。目前有关工作压力与建言行为的关系的研究仍存在分歧。本文从认知角度出发,根据资源守恒理论和成本收益分析理论,提出了建言价值认知和建言成本认知两个中介变量来构建工作压力与建言行为的认知模型,并假设不同类型的工作压力与建言行为关系不同。通过对国内三家大型企业260名员工的调查,对以上假设及模型进行检验。研究表明不同类型的工作压力对建言的影响机制和影响结果不同,挑战性压力促进建言行为,阻碍性压力抑制建言行为;员工会通过对比建言的价值和成本来决定是否建言。 With the development of the information age, enterprises pay more attention to employees' views and encourage them to express opinions. However voice behavior is not only socially risky, but also costs employees' time and energy. Therefore, employees experience more cognitive processes before they voice especially when they are under work stress. But the relationship between work stress and voice is still controversial. Assuming different types of work stress correlates differently with voice behavior, the paper proposes a cognitive model of work stress and voice behavior with perceived value and cost of voice behavior as mediators, based on theory of resources conservation and theory of cost-benefit analysis. A two-phase survey data were collected from 260 employees. The results showed that challenge stressor was positively correlated with both promotive voice and prohibitive voice. Hindrance stressor and promotive voice was negatively correlated while the relationship between hindrance stressor and prohibition is not significant. Meanwhile, the results suggest that different types of work stress affect the voice behavior through different cognitive way. Employees will decide whether voice or not based on cost benefit analysis.
出处 《中国人力资源开发》 北大核心 2016年第9期66-73,共8页 Human Resources Development of China
关键词 工作压力 建言行为 认知因素 资源守恒 成本收益分析 内隐性理论 Work Stress Voice Behavior Cognitive Factor Conservation of Resources Cost-benefit Analyses Implicit Voice Theories
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

二级参考文献177

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7630
  • 2段锦云,钟建安.组织中的进谏行为[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):69-71. 被引量:99
  • 3葛鲁嘉.体证和体验的方法对心理学研究的价值[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006(4):116-121. 被引量:13
  • 4柳恒超,许燕,王力.结构方程模型应用中模型选择的原理和方法[J].心理学探新,2007,27(1):75-78. 被引量:42
  • 5谢家琳.(2008).实地研究中的问卷调查法.见陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立(编),组织与管理研究的实证方法(PP161-177).北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 6Avery, D. R., Mckay, E F., Wilson, D. C., Volpone, S. D., & Killham, E. A. (2010). Does voice go flat? How tenure diminishes the impact of voice. Human Resource Management, 50(1), 147-158.
  • 7Bae, K. S., Chuma, H., Kato, T., Kim, D. B., & Ohashi, I. (2011). High performance work practices and employee voice: A comparison of Japanese and Korean workers. Industrial Relations, 50(1), 1-29.
  • 8Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. N J:Prentice-Hall.
  • 9Bandura, A.'(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • 10Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

共引文献533

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部