期刊文献+

中美礼仪差异的人己关系分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Sino-U.S. Differences in Social Etiquette from the Standpoint of Self-Other Relations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究从人己关系结构的角度对中美社交礼仪在恭雅洁三方面的差异进行比较分析。中国人的礼仪行为反映了熟人社会的人己关系,把他人按亲疏分类然后加以区别对待。美国人的礼仪行为反映了生人社会的人己关系,强调个人的独立和自立,形成了不分亲疏、一视同仁的礼仪原则。当今中美礼仪的差异在一定程度上反映了社会经济发展的两个不同时期在生活方式上的差别,随着中国现代化的不断深入,中美礼仪差异会逐渐缩小,但中国人的礼仪行为依然会具有中国的特点。 This paper presents a comparative analysis,from the standpoint of self-other relations,of Sino-U.S. differences in the three aspects of social etiquette:deference,elegance,and cleanness. The Chinese ritual practice reflects the self-other relations of an acquaintance society in which others are treated differently based on their social proximity to the self,whereas the American ritual practice reflects the self-other relations of a stranger society in which others are treated indiscriminately and equally based on the principle of independence and self-reliance. To certain extent, the current Sino-U.S. differences in social etiquette represent differences in mode of living at two different stages of societal development and the differences will be gradually narrowed as China's modernization further develops;nevertheless, the Chinese ritual practice will always retain its Chinese characteristics.
作者 赵善阳
机构地区 美国天普大学
出处 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期60-67,共8页 Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
关键词 礼貌 礼仪 人己关系 中美比较 politeness self-other relations Sino-U S comparison social etiquette
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1杨志刚.《中国礼仪制度研究》,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2000年.
  • 2李建荣.《社交礼仪》,北京:清华大学出版社,2007年,第8页.
  • 3Norbert Elias: "The History of Manners:The Civilizing Process" , Translated by Edmund Jephcott,New York: Pantheon Books, Volume One, 1939/1978.
  • 4Peter Johnson : "The Philosophy of Manners :A Study of the 'Little Virtues'", Sterling, VA : Thoemmes Press, 1999.
  • 5Jorge Arditi:"A Genealogy of Manners: Transformations of Social Relations in France and England from the Fourteenth to the Eighteenth Century", Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
  • 6Erving Goffman: "Interaction Ritual:Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior",New York: Pantheon Books,1967,pp.67.
  • 7Gabriele Kasper & Yanyin Zhang:"It's Good to he a Bit Chinese: Foreign Students' Experience of Chinese Pragmaties," in Gabriele Kasper ed.,Pragmatics of Chinese as Native and Target Language. University of Hawaii at Manoa,Seeond Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, 1995,pp.1-22.
  • 8Edward T Hall:"The Hidden Dimension",New York:Anchor Books, 1966.
  • 9Penelope Brown & Stephen C. Levinson:"Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage",New York:Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1978, pp.61.
  • 10Walter T Stace:"The Concept of Morals",New York: Peter Smith Publisher, 1937/1975,pp.136.

二级参考文献27

  • 1贺雪峰.乡村治理区域差异的研究视角与进路[J].社会科学辑刊,2006(1):44-50. 被引量:40
  • 2陈柏峰.村落纠纷中的“外人”[J].社会,2006,26(4):108-127. 被引量:21
  • 3苏力.费孝通、儒家文化和文化自觉[J].开放时代,2007(4):32-48. 被引量:28
  • 4戈夫曼.日常生活中的自我呈现[M].北京大学出版社,2008.
  • 5Beattie. 1979. Land and Lineage in China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • 6韩敏.2007.回应革命与改革[M].陆益龙,徐新玉,译.南京:江苏人民出版社.
  • 7贺雪峰.2008.农村的半熟人社会化与公共生活的重建[G]//中国乡村研究(第六辑).福州:福建教育出版社.
  • 8贺雪峰.2009.村治的逻辑[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社.
  • 9Ho Ping-ti. 1962. The Ladder of Success in Imprinal China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368 - 1911. New York .. Columbia Univeristy Press.
  • 10Hsiao Kung-ch' uan. 1960. Rural China: Imperial Control in the Nineteenth Century. Seattle: University ot Washington Press.

共引文献221

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部