期刊文献+

双人观察对肠镜息肉检出率影响的前瞻性研究 被引量:5

A prospective study for the influence of physician plus nurse observation during colonoscopy on polyp detection rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解医护双人观察在结肠镜检查退镜过程是否可以提高息肉检出率。方法连续性收集内镜室诊断性结肠镜检查患者,前瞻性地随机分医护双人观察组和医生单人观察组,记录比较两组的息肉检出率。结果在4个月研究期间共完成985例诊断性结肠镜检查,其中271例检出息肉,总704枚。498例医护双人观察组和487例医生单人观察组的息肉检出率分别为30.5%和24.4%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.032)。在医生单人观察组中,护士证实医生在21例患者中共漏检息肉27枚。结论医护双人观察在结肠镜检查退镜过程中协助医生共同观察可以提高息肉检出率。 Objective To understand whether physician plus nurse observation during colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy were prospectively randomized to physician plus nurse observation or only physician observation during withdrawal. Polyp detection rate was compared between the two groups. Results Of 985 patients in the four months study period, 498 were randomized to physician plus nurse double observation colonoscopy, and 487 to only physician observation during withdrawal. A total of 704 polyps in 271 patients were detected. Polyp detection rate in the physician plus nurse observation group was significantly higher than that in only physician observation group, with 30.5% vs 24.4%(P = 0.032) respectively. In the physician observation group, nurse found that 27 polyps in 21 patients were missed by physician. Conclusion Physician plus nurse observation during colonoscopy resulted in an increase in the number of polyps detection.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 北大核心 2016年第4期77-80,共4页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 结肠镜检查 息肉检出率 医护双人观察 colonoscopy polyp detection rate physician plus nurse observation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1HAREWOOD G, SHARMA V, GARMO P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia[J]. Gastrointest Endos, 2003, 58(1): 76-79.
  • 2HARRIS J, FROEHLICH F, WIETLISBACH V, et al. Factors associated with the technical performance of colonoscopy: an EGAPE study[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2007, 39(7): 678-689.
  • 3REX D. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2000, 51(1): 33-36.
  • 4VANRIN J, REITSMA J, STOKER J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2006, 101(2): 343-350.
  • 5ASLANIAN R, SHIEH K, CHAN W, et al. Nurse observation during colonoscopy increases polyp detection: a randomized prospective study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2013, 108(2): 166-172.
  • 6LAI E, CALDERWOOD A, DOROS G, et al. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: A valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research[J]. Gastrointest Endos, 2009, 69(3 Pt 2): 620-625.
  • 7KAMINSKI M F, REGULA J, KRASZEWSKA E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(14): 1372-1373.
  • 8EAST J E, STAVRINDIS M, TOMAS-GIBSON S, et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high defnition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ter, 2008, 28(6): 768-776.
  • 9EAST J E, SUZUKI N, BASSETT P, et al. Narrow band imaging with magnifcation for the characterization of small and diminutive colonic polyps: pit pattern and vascular pattern intensity[J]. Endoscopy, 2008, 40(10): 811-817.
  • 10BARCLAY R L, VICARI J J, DOUGHTY A S, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(24): 2533-2541.

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部