期刊文献+

影响小儿癫痫持续状态近期疗效的因素 被引量:4

Influential Factors Concerning Short-Term Efficacy of Child Epilepsy Status Epilepticus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨影响小儿癫痫持续状态(SE)近期疗效的因素。方法:104例SE住院治疗患儿,按性别、发病年龄、病因、诱因、发作类型、控制时间及治疗方案和相关检查(脑电图、头颅CT及头颅MRI)结果进行分组,采用χ2检验分析不同分组SE患儿出院时的近期治疗效果,分析影响SE患儿近期治疗的因素。结果:各年龄组SE患儿的病因多为癫痫,惊厥性癫痫持续状态(CSE)病因亦为癫痫(68.48%),以全身性CSE为主(91.3%);非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)病因多为颅内感染(50%);按性别、发病年龄、病因、诱因、临床发作类型,头颅CT、头颅MRI及脑电图结果分组,各分类依据的SE患儿组间近期疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),按治疗方案分组的SE患儿的近期疗效比较,咪达唑仑组治疗有效率(100%)高于非咪达唑仑组有效率(84.09%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:治疗方案是影响SE近期疗效的因素。 Objective: To investigate influential factors affect child epilepsy status epileptius( SE).Methods: 104 SE children patients were grouped according to gender,age of onset,etiological factors,inducement,clinical seizure types and the relevant factors impacting the short-term effects of status epilepticus in children( EEG,skull CT and skull MRI). χ2was adopted to test short-term efficacy of different groups SE children patients,and then analyzing influential factors. Results: Epilepsy was the main etiology factors for different groups SE children patients,CSE etiology factor was also epilepsy( 68. 48%),featured with full body CSE( 91. 3%); NCSE etiology factor was mainly intracranial infection( 50%); grouped according to gender,age of onset,etiology factors,clinical seizure types,skull CT,skull MRI and EEG,short term efficacy comparison was made,differences showed statistical significance( P〈 0. 05); short-term efficacy according to treatment categorization showed that midazolam group TER therapeutic efficiency ratio( 100%) was higher than non-midazolam group( 84h09%),differences were statistical significant( P〈 0. 05). Conclusion: The difference of treatment plans is the factor affecting the short-term efficacy of SE.
作者 陈妍惠 艾戎
出处 《贵阳医学院学报》 CAS 2016年第4期479-482,共4页 Journal of Guiyang Medical College
基金 贵州省省长基金临床应用课题专项研究(No:2012118)
关键词 癫痫持续状态 咪达唑仑 临床特点 近期疗效 影响因素 status epilepticus midazolam clinical features short-term effects influence factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Brophy GM,Bell R,Claassen J,et al.Neuroritical Care Society Staus Epilepticus Guideline Writing Committee.Guideline for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus[J].Neurocrit Cate,2012(17):3-23.
  • 2Meierkord H,Holtkamp M.Non-convulsive status epileptieusin adults:clinical forms and treatment[J].Lancel Neurol,2007(4):329-339.
  • 3申浩,常亮,管军,周晖.昏迷患者非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的临床特点[J].临床神经病学杂志,2013,26(3):228-230. 被引量:11
  • 4Skinner HJ,Dubon-Murcia SA,Thompson AR,et al.Adult convulsive status epilepticus in the developing country of Honduras[J].Seizure,2010(6):363-367.
  • 5Engel J.Report of the ILAE classification core group[J].Epilepsia,2006(9):1558-1568.
  • 6Nishyama I,Ohtsuka Y,Tsuda T,et al.An epidemiological study of children with status epilepticus in Okayama,Japan[J].Epilepsia,2007(6):1133-1137.
  • 7Shorvon S,Ferlisi M.The treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus:a critical review of available therapies and a clinical treament protocol[J].Brain,2011(134):2802.
  • 8Rossetti AO,Lowenstien DH.Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults[J].Lancet Neurol,2011(10):922.
  • 9黄月艳,秦炯.儿童癫痫持续状态56例临床研究[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(13):2402-2404. 被引量:12
  • 10洪震.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的治疗专家共识[J].中华神经科杂志,2013,46(2):133-137. 被引量:44

二级参考文献100

  • 1汪昕,彭伟锋.癫癎持续状态的处理及新进展[J].临床神经电生理学杂志,2006,15(4):234-237. 被引量:13
  • 2陈春富,郎森阳,贾海燕,夏程,王湘庆.癫痫持续状态患者发生多器官功能障碍的危险因素分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(7):618-622. 被引量:16
  • 3Strandberg M, Larsson EM, Backman S, et al. Presurgical epilepsy evaluation using 3T MRI. Do surface coils provide additional information? [J]. Epileptic Disord, 2008, 10:83-92.
  • 4Keller SS, Roberts N. Voxel-based morphometry of temporal lobe epilepsy: An introduction and review of the literature[J]. Epilepsia, 2008, 49(5): 741-757.
  • 5Wehner T, Lapresto E, Tkach J, et al. The value of interic tal diffusion-weighted imaging in lateralizing temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. Neurology, 2007, 68:122-127.
  • 6Thivard L, Adam C, Hasboun D, et al. Interictal diffusion MRI in partial epilepsies explored with intracerebral electrodes [J]. Brain, 2006, 129:375-385.
  • 7Hong KS, Cho YJ, Lee SK, et al. Diffusion changes sugges ting predominant vasogenic oedema during partial status epilepticus[J].Seizure, 2004,13:317-321.
  • 8Rugg Gunn FJ, Eriksson SH, Symms MR, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in refractory epilepsy[J]. Lancet, 2002, 359: 1748-1751.
  • 9Assaf BA, Mohamed FB, Abou Khaled KJ, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the hippocampal formation in temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2003, 24(9) : 1857-1862.
  • 10Gong G, Concha L, Beaulieu C, et al. Thalamic diffusion and volumetry in temporal lobe epilepsy with and without mesial temporal sclerosis[J]. Epilepsy Res, 2008, 80:184-193.

共引文献86

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部