期刊文献+

语法隐喻迁移的应用研究 被引量:5

Grammatical Metaphor Transferring and Its Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于Halliday系统功能语言学理论,探讨语法隐喻在二语习得中的个体发展规律。首先将取自不同受试组的60篇文章中的句子归类,再对比其中的语法隐喻出现的频率,然后利用独立样本T检验来验证二语写作中语法隐喻使用量是否随着语言水平的提高而增加,以此验证母语的隐喻思维是否会无条件地迁移过来。研究结果表明,学生在英语写作中人际隐喻的使用量随语言水平的提高而增加,但研究数据没能证明概念隐喻及语篇隐喻的发展也遵循这一规律。 This paper aims to study the individual development of grammatical metaphor in the second language acquisition from the perspective of Halliday’s systemic functional linguistic theory. We first classified all sentences in each of the 60 compositions collected, and then compared the frequency of various grammatical metaphors by independent samples T test to examine the correlations between learners’ language levels and their ability to use grammatical metaphors. It found that the total usage of interpersonal metaphor increases with the improvement of one’s language level. However, the data cannot prove the development of ideational and textual metaphors also follows this principle.
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2016年第3期1-5,共5页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
关键词 语法隐喻 迁移 概念隐喻 人际隐喻 语篇隐喻 Grammatical metaphor transfer ideational metaphor interpersonal metaphor textual metapho
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1HALLIDAY M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold. 1994: 352-353.
  • 2TAVERNIERS M. Interpersonal grammatical metaphor as double scoping and double grounding[J]. Word, 2008 (59): 1- 31.
  • 3丛迎旭,王红阳.基于语义变化的概念语法隐喻模式与类型[J].现代外语,2013,36(1):33-39. 被引量:30
  • 4MARTIN J R. English Text: System and Structure[M]. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1992: 416-417.
  • 5THOMPSON G. Introducing Functional Grammar[M]. London: Arnold, 2004: 226-231.
  • 6熊学亮,刘东虹. 英语学习中语法隐喻的迁移[C]//曾蕾, 廖海清,功能语言学与外语教学研究, 北京:外语教学与研究出版社, 2010: 291-301.
  • 7王蕙.英汉被动语态的对比研究[J].中国青年政治学院学报,2007,26(5):111-115. 被引量:16

二级参考文献18

  • 1刘承宇.概念隐喻与人际隐喻级转移的逆向性[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(4):289-293. 被引量:40
  • 2范文芳.试论语法隐喻的综合模式[J].外语教学,2007,28(4):12-15. 被引量:104
  • 3Richards et al. 2005. Longnma Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics(Third edition)[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press:746.
  • 4Quirk et al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language [M]. New York: Longman Group Limited:160.
  • 5Biber, D. et al. 2000. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English[M].Beijin: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • 6Dixon, R. M. W. 2005. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 7Fawcett, R. 2008. Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar. An Extension and Simplification of Halliday's Systemic Functional Grammar (3^rd edition) [M]. London : Equinox.
  • 8Fawcett, R. 2009. Functional Syntax Handbook: Analyzing English at the Level of Form [M]. London: Equinox.
  • 9Halliday, M. A. K. 1984/2005 metaphor in English and Chinese Grammatical [A]. In J. J.Webster (ed.). Studies in Chinese Language [C]. London/New York: Continuum, 325-333.
  • 10Halliday, M.A.K. 1998/2004. Things and relations: Regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge [A]. In J. J. Webster (ed.). The Language of Science [C]. London/New York: Continuum, 49-101.

共引文献44

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部