期刊文献+

妇婴疾病诊断相关组应用与评价 被引量:10

The Applications and Evaluation on Wemen and Infant's Diagnosis-related Groups
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨妇婴疾病诊断相关组模型的分组效果和应用评价。方法:比较分析WI-DRGs模型的组内同质性和组间异质性。比较分析WI-DRGs、CN-DRGs、MS-DRGS和AR-DRGs的分组效果,比较三个独立院区CMI指数以评价其应用效果。结果:WI-DRGs费用RIV为0.596,CV为0.10-0.54,平均住院日RIV为0.389,CV为0.02-0.22。WI-DRGs在妇婴疾病分组方面较优。结论:WI-DRGs组间异质性和组内同质性较好,具有较好的实用性,在控制费用增长,优化费用结构,尤其是提升妇幼卫生经费使用效率方面具有较广泛的应用前景。 Objective:To discuss the grouping effect and application evaluation of Women Infant-Diagnosis-RelatedGroups(WI-DRGs) model.Methods:The homogeneity within groups and heterogeneity among groups of WI-DRGs were evaluated.The grouping effects of WI-DRGs, CN-DRGs, MS-DRGs and AR-DRGs were compared. The CMI of three districts were compared toverify the application effects.Results:The cost RIV and CV of WI-DRGs were 0.596 and 0.10-0.54, length of stay RIV and CV were0.389 and 0.02-0.22. WI-DRGs were the preferred in grouping of wemen's and infants' disease.Conclusion:The heterogeneityamong groups and the homogeneity within groups were sound in the WI-DRGs system. WI-DRGs could be applied comprehensivelyin controlling the cost growth, optimizing cost structure, especially had extensive application prospect of promoting the usage efficiencyof maternal and child healthcare expenditure.
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2016年第5期81-83,共3页 Chinese Health Economics
基金 广东省自然科学基金项目(S2012010008269)
关键词 妇婴疾病诊断相关组 比较分析 医疗保险 maternal and infant disease diagnosis-related group comparisive anlysis medical insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1魏凌云,韩栋,徐金龙,章莹,雷莹.妇婴疾病诊断相关分组模型研究[J].长治医学院学报,2015,29(2):116-119. 被引量:4
  • 2World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2015[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
  • 3卫生部统计信息中心.中国卫生和计划生育统计年鉴2013[R].北京,2013.
  • 4WONG A, WOUTERSE B, SLOBBE L C, et al. Medical inno- vation and age-specific trends in health care utilization: find- ings and implications[J]. Soc sci med, 2012,74(2):263-272.
  • 5U.S. Department of Health&Human Service. 2003-2014 CMS Statistics[R]. Washington DC.: U.S. Department of Health & Human Service, 2014.
  • 6National Casemix Office, Health & Social Care Information Centre. National Casemix Office Design Framework 2012-2017[R]. National Casemix Office, Health & Social Care Information Centre, 2015.
  • 7北京市医院管理研究所,国家卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局.CN-DRGs分组方案(2014版)[G].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2015:716.
  • 8胡牧,杜圣普,陈剑铭.诊断相关组与预定额付费的应用条件和效果——以北京某医院DRGs-PPS试点为例[J].中国医疗保险,2013(5):32-34. 被引量:24

二级参考文献21

  • 1何凡,沈毅,刘碧瑶,汪萍,姚炯.浙江省住院病人病例组合研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(7):460-464. 被引量:21
  • 2Palmer G,Reid B. Evaluation of the performance of diagnosis-related groups and similar casemix systems: methodological issues. Health Services Management Research, 2001,14(2) :71-81.
  • 3Institut far das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus~ C-DRG Systems 2015. lnstitut far das Entgdtsystem im Krankenhaus,2014.
  • 4Busse R, Geissler A, Quentin W, et al. Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe: Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals[M]. McGraw-Hill International,2011.
  • 5Minist~re des Affaires sociales et de la Sant6. Manuel des groupes homog~nes de malades, ll~me version de la classification, 56me r6vision (llf). Minist~re des Affaires sociales et de la Sant~, 2014.
  • 6National Casemix Office. HRG4 Code to Group V4.5. Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2014.
  • 7Averill RF,Muldoon JH,Vertrees JC, et al. The evolution of easemix measurement using diagnosis related groups (DRGs)[J]. waningford: 3M Health Information Systems,1998.
  • 8Steinbusch PJ,Oostenbrink JB,Zuurbier JJ, et al. The risk of upcoding in casemix systems: a comparative study[J]. Health Policy,2007,81 (2) :289-299.
  • 9Victorian Government Department of Human. ictoria,public hospitals, policy and funding guidelines 1997- 1998. Victorian Gov ernment Department of Human Services, 1997.
  • 10Centers For Medicare And Medicaid. Improper Medicare fee-for service payments long reports. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, 2005.

共引文献26

同被引文献69

引证文献10

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部