期刊文献+

玻璃体腔注药联合不同时间段引流物植入术治疗新生血管青光眼的降眼压效果 被引量:8

Clinical observation of intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with Ahmed valve implantation for reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) at different times
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗后不同时间段联合Ahmed青光眼阀植入术对新生血管性青光眼的治疗效果.方法 回顾性临床病例系统研究.对2013年6月至2014年8月在光明眼科医院,选择药物无法控制眼压的新生血管性青光眼患者20例20只眼.将经济条件较好者9例9只眼归为A组;由于家庭条件限制11例11只眼患者选择择日行青光眼引流物降眼压归为B组.所有患眼均接受玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗(lucentis) 0.05 mL,A组于注药1周后行Ahmed青光眼阀门植入术;B组患者选择3~4周行青光眼阀门植入术,所有患者阀门植入术后及时行眼底荧光血管造影及视网膜光凝术.结果 注药后2~7 d,A组1只眼虹膜瞳孔领处残留血管,B组2只跟虹膜纹理处残留少许血管.A组玻璃体腔注药前眼压为35.0~51.5 (43.5±7.5) mmHg,注药后1周眼压为36.5~45.0 (40.5±5.5) mmHg,植入青光眼阀门手术后3个月眼压14.5~21.0 (17.3±2.5) mmHg,6个月眼压为12.5~22.0 (16.0±3.5) mmHg;B组玻璃体腔注药前眼压为35.0~53.0 (44.5±6.5) mmHg,注药后1周眼压为29.5~47.0 (37.0±5.6) mmHg,植入青光眼阀门手术后3个月眼压13.0~18.0 (15.0±2.1) mmHg,6个月眼压为14.5~20.0 (17.0±2.5) mmHg.A、B两组在注药前后,植入青光眼阀门前后眼压变化差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组术后眼压下降差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),青光眼阀植入术后随访6个月,所有患者眼压控制在正常范围.A组中2例术后前房浅近消失,未发生明显渗血等炎症反应;B组3例患者术中发生前房渗血,且术后第2天前房消失,炎症反应重.另随访中B组2例患者由于原发病加重前房渗血视力下降.青光眼阀植入术后视力提高者14例,视力无明显变化者5例.结论 两组不同时间段植入的青光眼阀手术本身对患者长期降眼压效果影响无明显差异,但为了尽可能减少术中、后并发症的发生及保护患者残存视力,建议有条件患者尽快选择青光眼阀门植入术. Objective To observe intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with Ahmed valve implantation for reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) at different times.Methods Twenty eyes with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) whose IOP could not be controlled by medicine were chosen (9 cases in group A,whose economic condition was better,another 11 cases in group B),all the cases were injected with ranibizumab (Lucentis) 0.05 mL,after 1 week the Ahmed valve implantation were performed in group A,while group B were performed at 3-4 weeks.Then the FFA and the retinal laser photocoagulation treatment were taken promptly.Results The iris neovessels were exist in 1 case (group A) from 2 days to 7 days after the injection,while in group B were 2 cases.In group A:The IOP before injection was 35.0-51.5 (43.5±7.5)mmHg,1 week after injection was 36.5-45.0 (40.5±5.5)mmHg,3 months after implantation was 14.5-21.0 (17.3±2.5)mmHg,6 months was 12.5-22.0 (16.0±3.5)mmHg;in group B:The IOP before injection was 35.0-53.0 (44.5±6.5) mmHg,1 week after injection was 29.5-47.0 (37.0±5.6)mmHg,3 months after implantation was 13.0-18.0 (15.0±2.1)mmHg,6 months was 14.5-20.0 (17.0±2.5)mmHg,there was no statistical difference (P 〉0.05) in two groups after implantation.In group A:anterior chamber disappearance happened in 2 cases,but no hyphema after implantation;group B:in the operation hyphema happened in 3 cases,and the anterior chamber disappeared in the next day,the visual acuity in 2 cases were decreased due to hyphema during follow-up period.In all the cases,the visual acuity in 14 cases was increased after implantation,unchanged in 5 cases.Conclusions There is no statistical difference about intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with Ahmed valve implantation for reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) at different times,but it is suggested that implanting Ahmed valve as soon as possible for reducing complications.
出处 《中国实用眼科杂志》 2016年第5期436-438,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
关键词 新生血管性青光眼 AHMED青光眼阀 雷珠单抗 Neovascular glaucoma Ahmed valve implantation Ranibizumab
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Shazly TA, Latina MA. Neovascular glaucoma: etiology, diagnosis and prognosis[J]. Semin Ophthalmol,2009,24(2):113-121.
  • 2Simha A,Braganza A,Abraham L,et al. Anti-vascular endotheli- al growth factor for neovascular glaucoma[J]. Cochrane Data- base Syst Rev,2013,10(6) :769-792.
  • 3Nagpal M,Nagpal K, Nagpal PN. A comparative debate on the various anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs: pegap- tanib sodium (Macugen), ranibizumab (Lueentis)and bevacizumab (Avastin) [ J ]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2007,55 ( 6 ) : 437-439.
  • 4Luke J,Nassar K,Luke M,Grisanti S. Ranibizumab as adjuvant in the treatment of rubeosis iridis and neovascular glauco- ma--results from a prospective interventional case series [J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2013,251 (10) : 2403-2413.
  • 5Elmekawey H, Khafagy A. Intracameral ranibizumab and subse- quent mitomycin C augmented trabeculectomy in neovascular glaucoma[J]. J Glaucoma,2014,23(7):437-440.
  • 6王俊,孟晓光,李秀云,李娜,李聪伶.Bevacizumab玻璃体内注射联合视网膜光凝及冷凝治疗新生血管性青光眼[J].眼科新进展,2014,34(6):557-559. 被引量:7

二级参考文献11

  • 1张熙伯,何跃,郑洋,段成霞.虹膜光凝、小梁切除、丝裂霉素C联合治疗晚期新生血管性青光眼[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2005,8(1):43-44. 被引量:5
  • 2Rebert L, Avery RL. Regression of retinal and iris neovascularization after intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment [ J ]. Retina, 2005,25 ( 3 ) : 352-354.
  • 3Olmos LC,Lee RK,Olmos LC,Lee RK. Medical and surgical treat- ment of neovascular glaucoma [J]. Int Ophthalmol Clin,2011, 51(3) :27-36.
  • 4Michels S, Rosenfeld P3, Puliafito CA, Marcus EN, Venkatraman AS. Systemic bevacizumab ( Avastin ) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration:twelve-week results of an un- controlled open-label clinical study [ J]. Ophthalmology, 2005, 112 (6) : 1035-1047.
  • 5Lira TH, Bae SH, Cho Y J, Lee JH, Kim HK, Sohn YH. Concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor after intracameral bevacizumab injection in eyes with neovascular glaucoma[J]. Korean J Ophthalmol.2009.23 (3), 188-192.
  • 6Woff A,Von Jagow B,Ulbig M,Haritoglou C. Intracameral injection of bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma [ J ]. Ophthalmologica, 2011,225 ( 2 ) :51-56.
  • 7Kiddee W, Tantisarasart T, Wangsupadilok B. Neovascutar glau- coma: a retrospective review of 5-year experience in Songk- lanagarind Hospital[J]. J Med Assoc Thai,2012,95 (4) :36-42.
  • 8Higashide T, Murotani E, Saito Y, Ohkubo S, Sugiyama K. Adverse events associated with intraocular injections of bevaci- zumab in eyes with neovascular glaucoma [ J ]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2012,250 ( 4 ) : 503 -510.
  • 9李秀云,李聪伶,王俊,李娜,赵岩松.Avastin联合周边视网膜冷冻术治疗晚期新生血管性青光眼[J].眼科新进展,2012,32(12):1142-1144. 被引量:4
  • 10刘红,秦平.玻璃体腔内注射Avastin联合睫状体光凝治疗新生血管性青光眼[J].新乡医学院学报,2013,30(3):216-217. 被引量:30

共引文献6

同被引文献46

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部