期刊文献+

应用哥特曼标尺于学习进程研制的探讨

Applying Guttman Scale in Development of Learning Progression
原文传递
导出
摘要 学习进程是促进形成性评价实施的关键所在,探讨教师如何研制学习进程有助于推广形成性评价。严格意义上,教师研制学习进程不仅需要逻辑基础,也需要经验基础。然而当前相关研究主要从逻辑分析的路径探讨学习进程研制,还缺乏实证经验层面的探讨,这恰恰是教师亟需的专业支持。就此,等级量表哥特曼标尺能为教师提供研制学习进程所需的适切工具,可与教师的逻辑分析加以联合。从操作角度看,这种联合结果可表征为三大研制环节:环节一包括确定终点学习目标、明晰学习单元、系列化学习单元,环节二主要任务是通过哥特曼标尺检验并完善环节一的设想,环节三主要任务是开发学习单元的成功标准。 Learning progression is the key to formative assessment, which can be promoted greatly through study on developing learning progression by teachers. Strictly speaking, learning progressions must have both empirical and logical basis. Current studies, however, mostly focused on the later without considering the former which is difficult for teachers. To solve the problem, Guttman scale is introduced into the paper. The research indicates that Guttman scale, regarded as an interval scale, is appropriate for teachers to develop learning progression, and can be integrated with teacher logic analysis. At the operational level, this integration result is shown in development procedure: in the first part, the main task includes determining terminal objective, defining building blocks, serializing building blocks; in the second part, the main task is to examine and improve the result made in the first part by Guttman scale; in the third part, the main task is to develop success criteria for building blocks.
作者 邵朝友
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期77-81,共5页 Research in Educational Development
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题"基于核心素养的形成性评价研究"(DHA150273)的部分成果
关键词 形成性评价 学习进程 哥特曼标尺 formative assessment, learning progression, guttman scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1Black,P.,Wiliam,D.Assessment and Classroom Learning[J].Assessment in Education, 1998, (3):7-74.
  • 2Popham,W. J. Transformative Assessment.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development[M]. ASCD, 2008.33.
  • 3Margaret Heritage,Jinok Kim,Terry Vendlinski,and Joan Herman. From Evidence to Action:A Seamless Process in Formative Assessment?[J]. Educational Measurement:Issues and Practice Fall, 2009,28 ( 3 ):24-31.
  • 4Salinas I. Learning Progressions in Sicence Education:Two Approaches for Development[C]. Iowa:Learning Progressions in Science Conference,2009.
  • 5National Research Council (NRC). Knowing What Students Know:the Science and Design of Educational Assessment[M].Washington:National Academics Press, 2001.44.
  • 6Margaret Heritage. Learning Progressions:Supporting Instruction and Formative Assessment. Paper prepared for the Formative Assessment for Teachers and Students (FAST) State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards (SCASS) of the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)[R].2008.
  • 7MacDonald, B. From Innovation to Reform a Framework for Analyzing Change. In. Rudduck, J (Ed), Innovation and Change [M]. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991.3.
  • 8黄月美、欧用生.美国大学教学改革的新典范-日本“单元教学研究”(lesson study)的应用[J].课程与教学季刊,2013,16(2).
  • 9Sch n, D. The Reflective Practitioner-How Professionals Think in Action[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
  • 10Mishler,E. Validation in Inquiry-Guided Research: The Role of Exemplars in Marrative Studies [J]. Harvard Educational Review, 1990, (60):415-442.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部