百家注和施顾注中的《乌台诗案》

Wutai Poem Case in “Bai Jia Zhu”and “Shi Gu Zhu”

作为今存宋人注苏诗的两个重要注本,施元之、顾禧、施宿的《注东坡先生诗》(施顾注)和王十朋的《王状元分类集注东坡先生诗》(百家注)中都有对《乌台诗案》文字的摘引,但学界对此基本视而不见。事实上,二者不仅引录的篇目、数量各不相同,而且都呈现出鲜明的特点和不可忽视的价值。百家注对《乌台诗案》的摘引,最突出的注家是赵次公,其不仅引《乌台诗案》对诗歌进行注释、借《乌台诗案》进行校勘和系年,还可补出一首不见于朋九万《东坡乌台诗案》和胡仔《苕溪渔隐丛话》的涉案诗歌,具有重要的文献价值。施顾注中,施宿则利用《乌台诗案》补出一首苏轼诗集未收的作品,再度彰显了《乌台诗案》在文献上不容忽视的价值。

As the two kinds of important annotation of Su Shi＇s poetry by the people in the Song Dynasty, ＂Shi Gu Zhu＂ and ＂Bai Jia Zhu＂ both had several quotations of Wutai Poem Case, which are completely ignored in academic circles. In fact, there are big differences between them. Each of them had their own peculiarity and values. In ＂Bai Jia Zhu ＂, Zhao Cigong＇s quotation was the most prominent. He not only annotated and amended them, but also supplemented the neglected poem in the Wutai Poem Case. In ＂Shi Gu Zhu＂, Shi Su used the Wutai Poem Case to supplement a poem that was not included in Su Shi＇s poetry anthology, reflecting its literary value again.