期刊文献+

品牌意图能动框架——品牌关系研究新进展 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立并维护消费者与品牌之间长久稳定的关系与企业的发展紧密相关。品牌意图能动框架作为品牌关系研究的新进展,创造性地将基于社会感知的刻板印象内容模型与品牌认知进行了有效整合,既为企业深入了解消费者心理和行为提供新的视角,又为测量品牌资产开拓新的维度。本文系统回顾了人际关系理论在品牌关系中的相关研究,论述了将刻板印象内容模型应用于品牌感知研究的合理性,阐明了基于刻板印象内容模型的品牌意图能动框架在品牌关系研究中的应用价值,指出了对品牌意图能动框架已有研究的不足和未来的研究趋势。 It is very important for enterprises to establish and maintain a long-term relationship between consumer and brand. As the new progress made in the study of brand relationship, brands as intentional agents framework have integrated the stereo- types of social perception model based on the social perception with the brand awareness effectively, which not only pro- vide the new perspective for consumer psychology and behavior, but also explore the new dimension for measuring brand equity. This paper systematically reviews the relevant research of interpersonal theory in brands relationship, and discusses the rationality of applying the stereotype content model to the study of brand perception, evaluates the application value of brands as intentional agents framework in the study of brand relationship, and points out the existing research gap and fu- ture trends of brands as intentional agents framework.
作者 李宏 杨双艳
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2016年第5期47-52,共6页 Enterprise Economy
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目"基于调节匹配的国产婴幼儿奶粉原产国刻板印象逆转研究"(项目编号:15YJC630055)
关键词 品牌意图能动框架 刻板印象内容模型 人际关系理论 品牌关系 brands as intentional agents framework stereotype content model interpersonal relationship theory brand relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Fournier S.Consumers and their brands:Developing relationship theory in consumer research[J].Journal of Consumer Research,1998,24,343–373.
  • 2Fournier S.Lessons learned about consumers'relationships with their brands[J].Priester,D.Mac Innis&C.W.Park(Eds.),Handbook of brand relationships(pp.5–23).N.Y:Society for Consumer Psychology and M.E.Sharp.
  • 3Bartholomew K&Horowitz L M.Attachment styles among young adults:A test of a four-category mode[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1991,61(2):226-244.
  • 4Clark M S&Mills J.The difference between communal and exchange relationships:What it is and not[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1993,19(6):684-691.
  • 5Nicolas Kervyn,Susan T.Fiske&Chris Malone,Brands as intentional agents framework:how perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception.[J]Sci Verse Science Direct Journal of Consumer Psychology,2012,221:66-176.
  • 6Aaker J,Fournier S&Brasel S A.When good brands do bad[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2004,31(1):1-16.
  • 7Blackston M.Observation:Building brand equity by managing the brand’s relationships[J].Journal of Advertising Research,1992,(M-ay/Jun):79-83.
  • 8Blackston M.Beyond brand personality:building brand relationships[M].Hilsdale,New Jersey,1993.
  • 9吴波,李东进.基于刻板印象内容模型的品牌感知研究评介[J].外国经济与管理,2013,35(3):57-63. 被引量:17
  • 10Epley.On seeing human:A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism[J].Psychological Review,2007,114(4):864-886.

二级参考文献30

  • 1Aaker J, et al. When good brands do bad[J]. Journal of Con- sumer Research, 2004, 31(1): 1 16.
  • 2Aaker J, et al. Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2010, 37(2): 224-237.
  • 3Aaker J, et al. Cultivating admiration in brands: Warmth, competence, and landing in the golden quadrant[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2012, 22(Z): 191-194.
  • 4Aggarwal P. The effects of brand relationship norms on con sumer attitudes and behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Re search, 2004, 31(1): 87-101.
  • 5Bartholomew K and Horowitz L M. Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61(2): 226-244.
  • 6Batra R, et al. Brand love[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2012, 76(2): 1-16.
  • 7Bennett A M and Hill R P. The universality of warmth and competence: A response to brands as intentional agents[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2012, 22(2) : 199-204.
  • 8Blackston M. Observations: Building brand equity by managing the brand's relationships[J]. Journal of Advertising Research, 1992, 32(3): 79-83.
  • 9Chitturi R, et al. Delight by design: The role of hedonic ver- sus utilitarian benefits[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2008, 72 (3): 48-63.
  • 10Clark M S and Mills J. The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1993, 19(6): 684-691.

共引文献16

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部