期刊文献+

上市公司内部监督模式选择与公司高管变更 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 以高管变更的可能性作为监督和约束公司高级管理人员的替代变量,建立Logistic回归模型实证检验了独立董事和监事会的治理绩效及两者之间的交互效应,结果发现:独立董事和监事会能显著提高公司高管变更的概率,而独立董事却不能对业绩不良的公司高级管理人员进行有效的监督和约束;独立董事和监事会之间是一种替代关系,未能协同提高上市公司治理监督的效率。这表明,我国上市公司的监事会具有较强的经济合理性,导入独立董事制度非但未能增强反而削弱了监事会的治理效率,从而为我国上市公司内部监督模式的合理选择提供了基于大样本的经验证据。
出处 《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第2期62-74,共13页 Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"上市公司内部监督模式合理选择:理论与实证研究"(13BGL045) 贵州大学引进人才科研项目"员工共同参与公司治理:理论基础与实现路径"[贵大人基合字(2015)001号] 重庆市社科规划博士项目"国有企业高管超额薪酬的激励与约束机制研究"(2015BS018)
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1~ USA3 Jensen, M C, Meckling, W H. Theory of the Firm: Manag- erial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure [ J 1- Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4) : 305-360.
  • 2[USA ]Fama, E F, Jensen, M C. Separation of Ownership and Control[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26(2) : 301 - 325.
  • 3[ USA ] Coughlan, A T, Sehmidt, R M. Executive Compensation, Management Turnover, and Firm Performance: An Empirical In-vestigation[ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1985, 7( 1- 3) : 43-66.
  • 4[ USA] Weisbach, M S. Outside Directors and CEO Turnover[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20(1-2) : 431-460.
  • 5[USA]Warner, J B, Watts, R L, Wruck, K H. Stock Prices and lop Management Changes [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20(1-2) : 461-492.
  • 6[ USA ] Murphy, K J, Zimmerman, J L. Financial Performance sur- rounding CEO Turnover[ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1993, 16(1-3) : 273-315.
  • 7[ USA ] Farrell, K A, Whidbee, D A. Monitoring by the Financial Press and Forced CEO Tumover[ J ]. Journal of Banking and Fi- nance, 2002, 26( 12): 2249-2276.
  • 8[ USA] Engel, E, Hayes, R M, Wang, X. CEO Turnover and Properties of Accounting Information [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2003, 36(1) : 197-226.
  • 9[ USA ]Kang, J, Shivdasani, A. Firm Performance, Corporate Governance, and Top Executive Turnover in Japan [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, 38(1) : 29-58.
  • 10[ GER]Leker, J, Salomo, S. CEO Turnover and Corporate Per- formance[ J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2000, 16 (3) : 287-303.

二级参考文献69

  • 1胡旭阳.民营企业家的政治身份与民营企业的融资便利——以浙江省民营百强企业为例[J].管理世界,2006,22(5):107-113. 被引量:505
  • 2赵震宇,杨之曙,白重恩.影响中国上市公司高管层变更的因素分析与实证检验[J].金融研究,2007(08A):76-89. 被引量:110
  • 3Lipton, M , Lorsch, J. A Model Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 1992, 59: 59-77.
  • 4Yermack, D. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996, 40,185-211.
  • 5Goyal, V, Park, C. Board Leadership Structure and CEO Turnover. Working Paper. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2000.
  • 6Coughlan, A T , Schmidt. R M. Executive Compensation. Management Turnover and Firm Performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1985, 7: 43-66.
  • 7Jensen, M , Murphy, K. Performance Pay and Top-management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98: 225-264.
  • 8Conyon, M J , Florou, A. Top Executive Dismissal, Ownership and Corporate Performance. Accounting and Business Research, 2002,32: 209-225.
  • 9Gibbons, R , Murphy, K. Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Offices. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,1990, 43: 30-51.
  • 10Parrino, R. CEO Turnover and Outsider Succession a Crosssectional Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997, 46:165-197.

共引文献375

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部