期刊文献+

共识中的差异——中国民族区域自治演进的历史考察 被引量:4

The Differences in the Consensus:Historical Analysis of the Evolution of Chinese Ethnic Regional Autonomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 受制于民族构成与分布的影响,中国的民族区域自治经历了《共同纲领》确定的"各少数民族聚居的地区实行民族的区域自治",向1954年《宪法》确定的"各少数民族聚居的地方实行区域自治"的变革。虽然二者均强调民族因素与区域因素的结合,但前者是在否定民族文化自治的基础上提出来的,强调的是少数民族在其聚居区实施的自治,而后者则是在民族构成与分布无法满足实施"民族的区域自治"要求的背景下提出的,强调的是民族自治地方内部各民族的联合自治。现行宪法和民族区域自治法的制定,受到了"民族的区域自治"和"各民族的联合自治"的双重影响。为有效坚持和完善民族区域自治制度,应以2014年中央民族工作会议提出的"民族区域自治不是某个民族独享的自治,民族自治地方更不是某个民族独有的地方"的论断为基础,以民族区域自治法确定的协商民主决策机制为核心,构建实现民族因素和区域因素有机结合的具体制度。 China’s regional ethnic autonomy has been through a reform developing from the "Areas where inhabited by ethnic groups carry out regional ethnic autonomy" in 〈 Common program 〉 to " Places inhabited by ethnic minorities practise regional autonomy" which determined by the 〈Constitution〉 in 1954 just because of the limitation of ethnic composition and distribution. Although both these two policies emphasize the combination of both ethnic and regional factors,but the former was been proposed based on the negation of the ethnic cultural autonomy,it emphasizes the implementation of minorities’ autonomy in their own ghettos while the latter was put forward on the condition that ethnic composition and distribution can not conform to the implementation of " Regional National Autonomy " and the emphasis is the joint autonomy within the nation. Those two policies both affected the formulation of the current constitution and the law on the regional ethnic autonomy. To uphold and improve the system of regional ethnic autonomy effectively,on the basis of the claim that "Regional ethnic autonomy is not exclusive to some specific nations,not even mention to the regions where share the ethnic autonomy don’t belong to some specific nations". It is the diagnosis that is put forward on the Central Ethnic Work Conference in 2014,therefore,it is necessary to treat the democratic decision-making mechanism determined in the law on regional national autonomy as the core and construct a concrete system to achieve the combination of ethnic factors and regional factors.
作者 田钒平
出处 《贵州民族研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期1-9,共9页 Guizhou Ethnic Studies
基金 国家社科基金项目"民族自治地方构建平等 团结 互助 和谐的民族关系若干重大法律问题研究(项目编号:10CFX012)" "四川省西部民族法治发展与创新研究"(项目编号:15TD0049) 西南民族大学研究生学位点建设项目(项目编号:2016XWD-S0301)
关键词 民族区域自治 民族聚居 民族杂居 理论差异 制度差异 Ethnic regional autonomy Inhabiting ethnic area Living multiethnic area theory difference system difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献11

  • 1戴小明.当代中国民族区域自治的价值分析[J].中国民族,2004(9):31-35. 被引量:5
  • 2雍海宾,宋芳.民族共治和民族区域自治的法学思考[J].西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(6):40-45. 被引量:6
  • 3周恩来.周恩来选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1982.
  • 4列宁.关于民族问题的批评意见[M].列宁全集.
  • 5甘肃省军区党史资料征集办公室.三军大会师:下册[M].兰州:甘肃人民出版社,590.
  • 6乌兰夫.民族区域自治的光辉历程[N].人民日报,1981-07-14.
  • 7额尔敦初古拉.应充分发挥自治主体民族的主人翁作用[N].中国民族报,2012-7-27.
  • 8列宁.关于民族平等和保护少数民族权利的法律草案[M]//列宁选集:第25卷.北京:人民出版社,1988:144.
  • 9李维汉.有关民族政策的若干问题[M]//李维汉选集.北京:人民出版社,1987:249-250.
  • 10李维汉.关于建立壮族自治区问题的一些看法和意见[M]//统一战线问题与民族问题.北京:人民出版社,1981:180.

共引文献24

同被引文献86

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部