期刊文献+

工作记忆容量与内容相关性对类别学习的影响 被引量:2

The Influences of Working Memory Capacity and Content Relevance on Category Learning
原文传递
导出
摘要 类别学习是通过不断地分类练习,学会如何将类别刺激进行归类的过程。采用2(工作记忆容量:高、低)×4(内容相关性:方向、宽度、亮度、控制组)被试间实验设计,通过两个实验探讨工作记忆容量与内容相关性对基于规则类别学习和信息整合类别学习的影响。结果显示:(1)对基于规则类别学习来说,在高工作记忆容量条件下,当关注相关维度时,类别学习的成绩更好;(2)对基于信息整合类别学习来说,不管工作记忆容量如何,只要关注相关维度类别学习的成绩更好。 Category learning is a process in which human beings classify perceptual simulations and acquire category knowledge by classification learning. 2 ( working memory capacity : high, low ) ×4 ( content relevance : direction, width, brightness, control) between-subject experiment were designed to explore the effects of working memory capacity and content relevance on category learning by two experiments. The results showed that : ( 1 ) 0nly under the condition of high capacity, focusing on the related dimensions can improve the classification performance in the rule-based category learning; (2) no matter what the working capacity is high or low, it can receive better classification performance if participants focus on the related dimensions of the information-integration category learning.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期324-329,共6页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 国家自然基金(31571144) 反馈对知觉类别学习影响的认知神经机制资助项目
关键词 类别学习 工作记忆容量 内容相关性 基于规则类别学习 信息整合类别学习 category learning working memory capacity dimension relevance rule-based category learning information integration category learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Ashby, F. G. , Alfonso-Reese, L. A. , Turken, U. , & Waldron , E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105 ( 3 ) ,442 - 481.
  • 2Ashby, F. G. , & Crossley, M. J. (2010). Interactions between de- clarative and procedural-learning categorization systems. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 94( 1 ), 1 - 12.
  • 3Ashby, F. G., Ell, S. W. , & Waldron, E. M. (2003). Procedural learn- ing in perceptual categorization. Memory & Cognition, 31 (7), 1114 - 1125.
  • 4Ashby, F. G. , & Maddox, W. T. (1990). Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy: Human Perception and Performance, 16 (3), 598 -612.
  • 5Ashby, F. G. , & Waldron, E. M. (2000). The neuropsychological bases of category learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(1), 10-14.
  • 6Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J. , Bunting, M. F. , Hambrick, D. Z. , Wilhelm, O. , & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user' s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 12(5), 769 -786.
  • 7DeCaro, M. S. ,Thomas, R. D. , & Beilock , S. L. (2008). Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory ca- pacity is better than more. Cognition, 107( 1 ) , 284 -294.
  • 8Filoteo, J. V. , Lauritzen, S. , & Maddox, W. T. (2010). Removing the frontal lobes :The effects of engaging executive functions on percep- tual category learning. Psychological Science, 21 (3) , 415 -423.
  • 9Grimm, L. R. , & Maddox,W. T. (2013). Differential impact of rele- vant and irrelevant dimension primes on rule-based and information-in- tegration category learning. Acta physiological, 144 (3) , 530 - 537.
  • 10Johansen, M. K., & Palmeri, T. J. (2002). Are there representational shifts during category learning. Cognitive Psychology,45(4), 482 -553.

二级参考文献61

  • 1刘凡.数字记忆广度对策略应用模式的影响──中美儿童计算能力差异的比较研究[J].心理科学,1994,17(1):21-27. 被引量:13
  • 2刘凡,David C.Geary,Christine Bow-Thomas,徐芬.比较研究——影响中美儿童计算能力差异的认知因素[J].心理科学,1993,16(1):22-27. 被引量:3
  • 3张奇,刘万伦.类别学习多重系统理论的研究与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):78-87. 被引量:5
  • 4Keri S, Kelemen O, Benedek G. Intact prototype learning in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res, 2001, 52(3): 261-264
  • 5Squire L R, Knowlton B J. Learning about categories in the absence of memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1995, 92 : 12470 - 12474
  • 6Reber P J, Squire L R. Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease. Behavioral Neuroscience 1999, 113 : 235 - 242
  • 7Reber P J, Stark CEL, Squire L R. Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory. Learning& Mem, 1998, 5: 420- 428
  • 8Aizenstein H J, MacDonald A W, Stenger V A, et al. Complementary category learning systems identified using event-related functional MRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscienee 2000,12 (6):977 - 987
  • 9Keri S, Kalman J, Rapcsak S Z, Antal A, et al. Classification learning in Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 1999, 122 : 1063 - 1068
  • 10Konishi S, Karwazu M, Uchida I, et al.1999. Contribution of working memory to transient activation in human inferior prefrontal cortex during performance of the Wisconsin Card SortingTest. Cerebral Cortex , 1999, 9 (7): 745-753

共引文献26

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部