摘要
目的:运用meta分析来了解宽恕与心理健康的关系。方法:通过系统检索CNKI数据库、中国科技期刊数据库、万方数据检索系统,收集有关宽恕与心理健康相关的研究。对宽恕与心理健康各指标的相关系数进行点估计及其95%CI分析。结果:共有26篇文献满足meta分析的要求,总样本量为12 060。宽恕与积极心理健康指标存在正相关(r=0.29,95%CI:0.26~0.32),宽恕与消极心理健康指标存在负相关(r=-0.31,95%CI:-0.26^-0.36)。宽恕的测量工具对宽恕与积极心理健康指标的关系、宽恕与消极心理健康指标的关系均有调解作用(Q=47.75、71.72,均P<0.001);宽恕的衡量指标对宽恕与积极心理健康指标的关系、宽恕与消极心理健康指标的关系均无调节作用(Q=0.04、1.73,均P>0.05)。结论:本研究发现,宽恕与心理健康存在着联系,不同宽恕测量工具能够调节宽恕与心理健康之间的关系。
Objective: To explore the relation of forgiveness to the positive standards and negative standards of mental health. Methods: The studies on the association between forgiveness and mental health were collected through the database of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wang Fang, China Science and Technology Jour- nal. Point estimate and 95% CI was calculated to analyze the association between forgiveness and mental health. Results: Totally 26 studies were met requirements of meta-analysis with the sample size of 12 060. There was significant positive correlation between forgiveness and positive mental health (r = 0. 29, 95 % CI: O. 26 -0. 32) and negative correlation between forgiveness and negative mental health (r = -0. 31, 95% CI: -O. 26 - -0. 36). The forgiveness quality measuring tool was able to adjust the relation of forgiveness and positive mental health (Q = 47.75, P 〈 0. 001) and forgiveness and negative mental health ( Q = 71.72, P 〈 0. 001 ). The measurement index of forgiveness was not able to adjust the relation of forgiveness and positive mental health( Q = 0.04, P 〉 0. 05)and forgiveness and negative mental health ( Q = 1.73, P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion: The finding shows an accurate estimate of the relationship between mental health and forgiveness.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第5期395-400,共6页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金
黑龙江省教育厅人文社科项目"儿童期心理虐待与忽视对大学新生认知模式及适应性影响研究"(12542341)