期刊文献+

国家与社会关系的当代调适及其发展辩证法——基于马克思政治哲学范式的“治理”研究 被引量:13

Contemporary Adjustment and Development Dialectics of Relationship between State and Society: A Research on Governance from Perspective of Marxian Political Philosophy Paradigm
原文传递
导出
摘要 马克思政治哲学对国家与社会关系基本发展趋向的分析,是治理理论应予倚重的思想资源。马克思的学说科学揭示了社会发展一定阶段上国家权能的重要作用,也提出通过建立一种超越"政治解放"的新型民主制来实现对市民社会与国家的双重扬弃。这就启示人们:一方面,当代治理理论要走出以市民社会为根本取向的研究路径;社会力量参与多元共治并不意味着国家权能式微。另一方面,要认清西方治理话语因受制于资本主义结构而存在的阐释局限;事实上只有在社会主义条件下实现人民当家作主才能真正克服国家与社会关系的内在矛盾,发展出一种国家与社会呈现良性互动状态的新型治理模式。 The analysis of Marxian political philosophy on the basic trend of relationship between state and society is ideological resource that governance theory should rely on. Marx's doctrine correctly reveals an important role competence of state plays in a specific stage in human history and puts forward to realize dual sublation of civil society and state through setting up a brand-new democracy which will transcend 'political liberation'. This leads us to the following interrelated opinions. For one thing,contemporary governance theory ought to get out of the research methodology of taking civil society as the fundamental orientation. The engagement of social forces in synergetic governance of pluralism doesn't mean that competence of state has declined. For another,we need to clearly understand the interpretation limitation of western governance discourse due to capitalist structure. In fact,it is only with the process of realizing the position of the people as masters of the country in socialist society that humans can really overcome the contradictory relationship between state and society and then develop a brand-new governance in which state and society interact friendly.
作者 连朝毅
出处 《政治学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期32-39,126,共8页 CASS Journal of Political Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"马克思主义社会管理理论及其中国化研究"(13CKS009)的研究成果 福建省高等学校新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(2014FJ-NCET-SK01)的研究成果
关键词 马克思主义 国家与社会 治理 国家权能 社会管理 marxism state and society governance competence of state social management
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1杰瑞.斯托克,楼苏萍,郁建兴.地方治理研究:范式、理论与启示[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,37(2):5-15. 被引量:88
  • 2.《马克思恩格斯全集》第1卷[M].人民出版社,1956年.第459页.
  • 3P. D. Hutchcroft," Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power" ,Governance:An International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2001.
  • 4.《马克思恩格斯全集》第41卷[M].人民出版社,1982年版.第211页.
  • 5.《马克思恩格斯选集》第4卷[M].人民出版社,1995年版..
  • 6.《马克思恩格斯选集》第3卷[M].人民出版社,1995年.第732页.
  • 7.《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷[M].人民出版社,1995年.第61页.
  • 8.《马克思恩格斯全集》第4卷[M].人民出版社,1972年版.第163页.
  • 9黑格尔.《法哲学原理》[M].商务印书馆,1961年版.第170页.
  • 10《马克思恩格斯全集》第1卷.[北京]人民出版社,1995年版,第203页,第123页,第416页.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Salamon,L.The Tools of Government.A Guide to the New Governance[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2002.
  • 2Rhodes,R.Understanding Governance[M].Buckingham:Open University Press,1997.
  • 3Kettl,D.F.The Transformation of Governance[M].Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,2002.
  • 4Kjaer,A-M.Governance[M].Oxford:Polity,2004.
  • 5Kirkert,W.,Klijn,E-H.,Koppenjan,J.Managing complex Networks.Strategies for the Public Sector[M].London:Sage,1999.
  • 6Sorensen,E.Metagovernance:the Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic governance[J].The American Review of Public Administration,2006,36,(1):98-114.
  • 7Provan,K.,Milward,B.Do Networks really work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-sector Organizational networks'[J].Public Administration Review,2001,61(4):414-423.
  • 8Bendor,J.,Glazer,A.,Hammond,T.Theories of Delegation[J].Annual Review of Political Science.2001,(4):235-269.
  • 9Bevir,M.A Decentred Theory of Governance[A].Bang,H.Governance as Social and Political Communication[C].Manchester:Manchester University Press,2003.200-221.
  • 10Bang,H.Governance as Social and Political Communication[C].Manchester:Manchester University Press,2003.

同被引文献231

引证文献13

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部