试论定密争议之解决--从高考评分标准被定密谈起

On Solution of Secret Determination Objection: Speaking of College Entrance Examination Scoring Criteria Being Determined as State Secret

在现有体制下,人民法院难以承担对国家秘密进行实质审查的任务,亦无力对行政机关的过度保密行为形成有效的制约。应当建立更加多元化的定密争议解决方式,以推动政府信息公开:一是重拾《政府信息公开条例专家建议稿》中的方案,建立信息委员会;二是赋予公民定密异议权。结合日本、美国等国家和地区的经验,就信息委员会的定位、信息委员会与行政复议委员会的关系、定密异议与强制解密审查制度的比较等相关法律问题进行探讨,具有现实意义。

Under the existing system, it is difficult for the people＇s court to undertake the task of substantive examination of state secrets, and it is also enable to form an effective control over the excessive secrecy behaviors by administrative organs. Therefore,a more diversified solution method concerning the secret determination objection should be established. On one hand, backing to the Expert Proposal of the Government Information Publicity Regulation, the information committee should be set up. On the other hand, the citizens should be given the right of secret determination objection. Combined with experience of Japan, the United States and other countries and regions, this paper conducts discussions on related legal issues such as the position of the information committee, the relationship between the committee and the administrative reconsideration committee, and the system compare between secret determination objection and compulsorydecryption review, etc.